Movie Reviews
‘Shook’ Review: Taking Telephone Horror Into The Age Of Screen Life
Social media influencers are usually attractive and have huge followings. They promote a life of grandness and desirability; they influence what we eat, what to wear, where we travel, basically how we live our lives. Shook, written and directed by Jennifer Harrington, is a Shudder original film that takes a look at how society has become social media-obsessed and what cost it takes to become Insta-famous.

In Shook, Mia (Daisye Tutor) is a social media influencer, with a massive number of followers – a life filled with glitz and glamour. Her life is one big Instagram post, but it’s all a façade as the film opens with Mia posing and live streaming at a red-carpet event, only to come to find out that the event is all fake and actually being filmed in a parking lot.

When a Stranger Calls — 1979
In the real world, her family life is a different story, as she and her sister Nicole (Emily Goss) have a strained relationship after Nicole feels resentful for taking care of their sick mother who passed away from “Livingston disease,” while Mia was out living her life. A little jealousy and resentment formed between the two sisters.
Nicole, thinking she may also have Livingston disease, needs to travel to see a specialist, so she asks Mia to watch over her beloved dog Chico. Caught in a dilemma, Mia has to choose between watching her sister’s dog or participate in a live stream with friends. What’s an influencer to do? To keep up her image of the good sister; Mia agrees to watch Chico. This is where the film takes off.

“Shook” Shudder (2021)
All alone, Mia, begins receiving phone calls from an unknown caller, who calls himself Kellan. Slowly scaring her, Kellan begins harassing Mia. Taunting her with personal questions about her life. The situation becomes all too real when the mysterious caller snatches Chico.
As the dangers become real for Mia, Harrington ramps up the tension and suspense with Kellan putting Mia through a game of tests, much like the games in Saw and Scream, where Mia has to either answer random questions correctly, or someone she cares about gets brutally killed. It’s the horror genre’s version of Sophie’s Choice.
Harrington keeps you engaged the entire time as Shook is filled with twists and turns, Throughout the film you’re wondering; Is this real? Or is it all in her mind due to the disease? Or is someone just playing a sick game with her?

“Shook” Shudder
Not since Scream have phone calls been so terrifying, Shook pulls from such classics like When A Stranger Calls, Scream, and Saw while also using the screen life format that has become popular with such films like Unfriended and Host. What makes Shook interesting is that it combines all these classic slasher tropes, like a mysterious caller toying with a girl all alone in a house, and combines them with this new trend of horror which is the screen life format.
For a slasher film, the film doesn’t rely on cheap scares but more on suspense with the “mysterious caller” stalking Mia, watching her, and taunting her. But when the violence is there, it’s brutal. Specifically, when Mia is forced to inject herself, and a scene that only can be compared to Dr. Gordon cutting off his leg in Saw.
Shook is visually striking, it’s flashy, electric, and sexy. The film has this artsy, 80’s vibe going on as Harrington uses vibrant colors while cleverly doing her own spin on the screen life format by projecting all of Mia’s social interactions from her laptop on the walls or floors. Harrington wrote a strong script that brought a grounded element to the film with the dynamics between the two sisters that we don’t often see in slasher films.
A new scream queen has emerged with Daisye Tutor as she’s really put through the wringer. She makes you empathize with her; when she’s scared, you’re scared and when she is put in a predicament, you want her to survive. It was exciting to watch Tutor’s character go from this vapid-type character to a sympathetic, strong final girl.
In the end, Shook is an emotionally driven, raw violent film. Those who enjoy films like Saw and Unfriended will enjoy Shook. Harrington created a new slasher for the tech generation that’s not only scary but will become an Insta-slasher classic. Check Shook out now, streaming only on Shudder.

Movie Reviews
‘And Her Body Was Never Found’ Takes Found Footage Somewhere New
Mor Cohen and Polaris Banks made a film about their real relationship. It opens the way you might expect a film about a real relationship to open, which is to say: uncomfortably.
The film opens on a man masturbating onto his wife’s chest while the two of them sit in a river. This is not a metaphor. Or rather, it is very much a metaphor, but it is also literally happening on screen. He keeps asking her to take her yop off. She doesn’t want to. He keeps asking anyway, because that is what this man does with every limit he runs into, he treats it as a negotiation he is already winning.
This is how And Her Body Was Never Found introduces itself at SXSW 2026. Buckle up.
Two Bodies in the Frame

After the river, the cinematography immediately tells you where you stand. We see the back of her head in close-up, frame-filling, a wall of hair and refusal. He is in the far distance behind her, trying to to keep up. She is not waiting. You read the entire relationship before anyone opens their mouth again.
When they do sit down, she offers him a sandwich. It is a peace offering. It is an olive branch. In the context of this relationship, it is a mistake, because he immediately uses the olive branch to restart the argument. If you have ever loved someone profoundly frustrating, this scene will reach through the screen and grab you by the collar in the most empathetic possible way.
The fight spirals the way real fights spiral, not toward a point but away from one. Semantics get weaponized. He gaslights. The argument rolls over everything except the actual subject. She gets to the point where she raises a stick, and honestly, given the last forty-eight hours, a jury of her peers would understand completely. At the campsite that evening, she tells him she is done. The marriage is over.
The next morning, he says everything right. Every single thing. The full lovebombing playbook: the apology that sounds like he finally gets it, the warmth that feels real, the version of him she fell for showing up right on schedule. Anyone who has ever stood at that crossroads recognizes this moment in their bones. The film does not editorialize. It just watches.
The Cliff Scene

The film’s pivot arrives at a cliff overlook, with something that sounds unmistakably like Wizard of Oz music underneath it. She stands away from the cliff edge, keeping her distance from him. The film makes it clear she is briefly considering how easy it would be to resolve this situation unilaterally. He guilts her onto the ledge through emotional blackmail dressed as a trust exercise.
And then he pushes her.
This is where And Her Body Was Never Found breaks itself open. The take ends. The characters step out. Mor and Polaris are no longer their characters. They are Mor and Polaris, and he is furious about where his hand landed, and she is shaken in a way that does not feel scripted, because it is not scripted, because this part is not the movie anymore. She refuses to continue the scene.
The fourth wall does not just come down here. It gets dismantled and examined.
Blair Witch Country

A cut to night. She is in her tent, filming herself on her phone in vertical format. The frame is narrow and confining. The dark outside is absolute. She says out loud that it would be easy to kill her out here and get rid of the body. Nobody would know.
The Blair Witch Project comparison is not subtle and does not need to be. It is being invoked consciously, as a reference point for what it feels like when the camera becomes the only witness. The found footage mode here is not an aesthetic choice so much as evidence collection, and the film is smart about what that implies.
The film’s formal announcement that it is a meta project, two filmmakers making something about their own fights, arrives here. It reconfigures everything that preceded it without invalidating any of it.
Hat on a Hat on a Hat

This is also where the film begins to strain, just slightly. And Her Body Was Never Found has already broken the fourth wall once, then reconstructed it, then broken it again. Characters comment on the layers. The commentary becomes its own layer.
The film ends somewhere past the point where you can usefully track what is cinema and what is meta and what is real. That disorientation is partly the point. It is also, at a certain moment past the film’s last clean beat, a miscalculation. The movie keeps going after it has already landed.
What Banks and Cohen Got Right

A lot, is the answer. The performance dynamics are precise in a way that indie horror rarely achieves. The cinematography is working on multiple levels simultaneously. The abuse arc is drawn with enough specificity to feel observed rather than constructed, which is not a small thing when both filmmakers are also the subjects.
Polaris Banks and Mor Cohen are making something genuinely new here. Other critics at SXSW noted how cleverly written the film is. That is true. It is also, in places, too clever for its own good, and the film never entirely resolves the tension between those two facts. The overreach at the end does not undo what precedes it. It just means the thing that is most impressive about this project, the willingness to keep pushing the structure past the point of comfort, is also the thing that gets it into trouble in the final ten minutes.
At seventy-five minutes, it is still a tight film that keeps the tension high and earns most of its ambition. The structural risks it takes are real risks, not aesthetic posturing. And the film it is in conversation with, the long tradition of found footage as emotional exposure, is richer for having this in it.
Movie Reviews
The Serpent’s Skin Is Everything We’ve Been Asking Queer Horror For
We need to talk about Alexandra McVicker.
I came into The Serpent’s Skin ready to watch Alice Maio Mackay do her thing. And she does, we’ll get there. But McVicker as Anna stopped me cold within the first ten minutes and didn’t let go. She’s playing timid in a way I haven’t seen done right in a long time. There’s this quality to her where you can feel how carefully she’s holding herself, like she’s protecting something she knows is fragile but real, and every time the camera goes in close you catch it. Mackay leans into those close-ups hard, Obsession-style. The kind of framing where a face becomes its own landscape, and McVicker rewards it every single time. The hope sitting underneath all that timidity is quiet enough that you might miss it if you’re not paying attention. Don’t miss it. It’s the whole movie.

Okay. Mackay. Six features, twenty-one years old, and The Serpent’s Skin is where she lands on the version of herself she’s been moving toward since So Vam. The trans experience isn’t the plot here so much as it’s the weather. It’s in how Anna walks into rooms, in what she’s leaving behind before we even meet her, in what the stakes actually are when the supernatural stuff kicks in. You don’t get a monologue explaining any of it. If you live inside it, you’ll feel the whole shape. If you don’t, you’ll still have a good time, which is the harder trick and the one she pulls off. Her trajectory across these films has been toward exactly this. Trans characters moved from background to center, and now center to core. The Serpent’s Skin is where that project feels complete.
There’s a scene with Danny, where he hits on Anna, and the sexual tension in that scene seeps through the screen in a way that I was not expecting from a Tuesday afternoon screener. The chemistry is real, and it’s uncomfortable, and it’s good. And then Danny transforms, and the makeup team gave him something right out of the Buffyverse practical effects playbook. That same textured ridge work, monsters that feel like they share actual air with the people they’re threatening. The whole sequence recontextualizes everything that came before it. It’s a good piece of filmmaking. The setup earns the scare.

One note, offered with love: there is an intimate scene where someone spits on their hand. I understand the intention. A woman this competent in every other area of her life would carry lube. She should carry lube. This is my only complaint about The Serpent’s Skin and I recognize how good that is.
The whole visual world is neon-soaked in a way that feels deliberate at every level rather than just aesthetic. Every color is a reference or a warning. The festival circuit noticed. They were right.

Here’s what I can’t stop thinking about, though. The Serpent’s Skin is a very good movie that is also, structurally, a pilot. The mythology has room in it. Anna and Gen and the world they’re building has room in it. I want eight seasons of twenty-two episodes. I want monster of the week. I want to watch this relationship grow across years in the same way we got to watch the Winchesters figure their lives out, except this time nobody’s queerness is subtext, nobody’s trans identity is a twist, and the story belongs to them from the start. Give us that show. Someone give us that show now.
But until then we have this, and this is worth your time and your money and the drive to wherever it’s playing near you. Horror has been asking for a film that centers queer women without making the queerness the tragedy, that uses the supernatural as something other than a metaphor for shame, that trusts its audience enough to just tell the story and let us feel it. The Serpent’s Skin is that film. Alice Maio Mackay made it at twenty-one. We should probably all be embarrassed about that, in the best possible way.

Where to see it:
Now playing New York, NY — March 27 | Los Angeles, CA — April 3
Upcoming screenings
- 4/10, 4/11 — Denver, CO — Sie FilmCenter
- 4/11 — Boston, MA — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Boston Seaport
- 4/11 — Chicago, IL — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Wrigleyville
- 4/11 — Dallas, TX — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Cedars
- 4/11 — Denton, TX — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Denton
- 4/11 — New York, NY — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Lower Manhattan
- 4/11 — Yonkers, NY — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Yonkers
- 4/11 — Raleigh, NC — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Raleigh
- 4/11 — San Antonio, TX — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Park North
- 4/11 — San Francisco, CA — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema New Mission
- 4/11 — Santa Clara, CA — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Valley Fair
- 4/11 — Woodbury, MN — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Woodbury
- 4/11 — Naples, FL — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Naples
- 4/11, 4/13 — Denver, CO — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Sloans Lake
- 4/11, 4/14 — Austin, TX — Alamo Drafthouse South Lamar
- 4/25 — Sacramento, CA — The Dreamland Cinema
- 5/14 — Sebastopol, CA — Rialto Cinema
- 6/8 — Portland, OR — Clinton Street Theater
Movie Reviews
[Review] ‘The Kinderhook Creature: In The Shadow of Sasquatch’ – A Haunting Mystery
Director Seth Breedlove continues his exploration of American folklore with The Kinderhook Creature: In the Shadow of Sasquatch, a quietly unsettling and reflective documentary that blends eyewitness testimony with deeply personal storytelling. Known for his work with Small Town Monsters, Breedlove once again leans into atmosphere over spectacle, delivering a film that feels as much like a character study as it does an investigation into the unknown.
Set in the quiet town of Kinderhook, New York, the film centers on author and radio broadcaster Bruce Hallenbeck, whose alleged encounters with a mysterious upright creature in the 1980s helped shape the legend of the so-called Kinderhook Creature. Rather than presenting the story as a straightforward cryptid hunt, the documentary frames these events through Hallenbeck’s life and experiences, creating a narrative that is both intimate and quietly unnerving.

Breedlove’s approach favors mood and reflection, allowing the weight of the story to build through interviews, recollections, and the enduring impact these encounters have had on those involved. The film also touches on broader paranormal elements, suggesting that the creature sightings may be only one part of a much larger and stranger series of events.
What sets In the Shadow of Sasquatch apart is its restraint. It avoids sensationalism, instead focusing on the human side of belief, memory, and mystery. For longtime followers of Small Town Monsters, the film fits comfortably alongside previous entries like The Mothman of Point Pleasant and On the Trail of Bigfoot, continuing the studio’s signature blend of folklore and grounded storytelling.

While viewers looking for definitive answers may not find them here, the documentary succeeds in presenting a compelling and thoughtful look at a decades-old mystery that still lingers.
The Kinderhook Creature: In the Shadow of Sasquatch arrives on digital platforms March 24, offering a quietly haunting entry that lingers long after the credits roll.
-
News2 days agoThe Evil Dead Burn Trailer Is Here and It Is Everything
-
News6 days agoThis Week in Horror: CinemaCon Delivered, Nicolas Cage Is Coming Back, and Someone Let Ti West Near a Christmas Story
-
News3 days agoThe Practical Magic 2 Teaser Trailer Is Finally Here
-
News3 days agoThe Evil Dead Universe Now Includes a Mummy Film
-
Lists4 days ago10 Horror, Thriller, and True Crime Series to Watch This Spring
-
News4 days agoThe HUNGRY Red Band Trailer Is Here and We Need to Stop Laughing at the Hippo
-
Trailers2 days ago“It’s My Era. I’m a Rockstar Now.” The Official ‘The Vampire Lestat’ Trailer Is Here
-
Editorial6 days ago‘Behind The Mask’ is a Love Letter to Slashers



You must be logged in to post a comment Login