Movie Reviews
Shark Film ‘MANEATER’ Shows No Mercy!
To highlight the release of Maneater, star Nicky Whelan chatted with iHorror on how the film was made.
The latest killer shark film, Maneater, shows no mercy and does a splendid job of delivering a high body count. This film has received gaping reviews, many are hating on it, but I plan on showing this film a little love. The film is not overwhelming or astounding, but I had a great time! Right away, the audience receives death and wastes no time setting the story up for more. The question is asked early on, “who will live and who will die?” Director Lee isn’t camera shy and has no qualms about lingering over the gore caused by the massive shark.
We’ve all seen different variations of Great White Sharks throughout our favorite shark movies; some are better than others. This shark does change quite often throughout the film, the look, and the size quite noticeably, and this still did not stop me from having a fabulous time. Sometimes you do your best with what you have; I respect that with cinema, and I am just a sucker for shark films, ha!

I believe sometimes we don’t watch killer shark movies for the plot or characters, but it’s a pure bonus when we get something more!
Despite many of the cast members being picked off one by one, some very quickly, there was some character development, especially with Jessie (Nicky Whelan). Jessie had just come out of a long-term relationship, and her friends dragged and “made” her come to this tropical paradise with them. The story is kept relatively simple, and sometimes it can become a bit cliché, but hell, I didn’t mind; it was a bloody good time!
MANEATER is now available in theaters, digital, and on-demand from Saban Films.
Synopsis: Jesse and her friends’ idyllic island vacation turns into a gruesome nightmare when they become the target of an unrelenting great white shark. Desperate to survive, she teams up with a local sea captain to stop the vicious maneater before it strikes again in this heart-pounding thriller.
I had the privilege of speaking with star Nicky Whelan (Jessie) from the film. Nicky was a blast, and I hope I can talk to her again about her future projects. We spoke about Maneater, of course, and touched upon her work with Rob Zombie, upcoming features, and Halloween traditions in Australia (where she grew up). Check out our conversation below; you’ll be glad you did.
Conversation With Actress Nicky Whelan

Nicky Whelan: Hi, Ryan.
iHorror: Hi, Nicky, how are you?
NW: I am well, thank you, love; how are you?
iH: I am doing good; thank you so much for taking my call today. I have a few questions; first and foremost, I enjoyed the film. I enjoyed the characters, and it was what I was looking for; it fit in well with my weekend watch, and there were many great things about it. The cinematography was gorgeous; it was beautifully shot. A couple of the characters I did care about, especially Captain Wally, I was so upset when the shark ate him. Both of your characters had such good chemistry; I was hoping there would have been something.
NW: I think in the earlier script, there was something that was going to happen with our characters, and I do not know why it didn’t go in that direction; something had changed in the script. To be honest with you, I liked how it didn’t turn into a romantic story, and it came more about the independent vibe that my character got to have and the father/daughter connection that was developed with the Trace Adkins character [Harlan]. So it’s interesting that you say that, yet I like the way we went with the ending because it wasn’t your typical sort of ending; I kinda liked it.

iH: It was different. It was great either way. When you got attached to the project, was it a normal interview, or was there anything special about you getting attached?
NW: You know, I’ve worked with those guys before, and they sent me the script, and I was like, ‘oh my goodness, a shark movie, let’s do this.’ Shark movies are great; they come out all the time and have a huge following. People have either made crazy ridiculous ones or realistic ones; people have a thing for shark movies. I was like, ‘okay, let’s give this a crack,’ and it was in Hawaii, and I am like, ‘yes, please.’
iH: I actually didn’t know that; now it’s usually one hundred percent CGI.
NW: Absolutely, and obviously, we did use a CGI shark throughout the movie, but there are moments where Justin [Lee, Director] wanted to use it, and we were like, ‘okay, let’s do this, it’s gonna drive us all crazy but let’s give it a crack’ [laughs].
iH: Was there anything in particular about the shoot that was challenging or difficult?
NW: The entire production, it was an independent shark movie being made in 18 days with a mechanical shark under pretty crazy conditions. As an entire team, we really went in old school. It was very challenging; the water conditions were full on, and we had limited time and money, so we were proud of the result. I was personally challenged physically on this movie. I wasn’t prepared to do the swimming [laughs]. I was like, ‘oh shit.’ I consider myself sort of fit, but this kicked my ass, and I was exhausted from swimming in the water all day and the ocean. The locals really took care of us, and we felt very safe. The boiling heat and rough water and early starts. It was a lot. Using the mechanical shark and having the puppeteers there, lugging this thing in and out of the water. The camera crew was standing in the water for hours, not knowing what was at their feet; it was no joke; I was scared a few times [shrieks, laughs]. It was full-on.

iH: Did you see anything in the water when you were there?
NW: No, just a few fish. It was the beautiful waters of Hawaii. It was very safe; Hawaii is a great place. I have been there many times before. It wasn’t so much of the fear of what was in the water. I was sometimes a little nervous because I couldn’t see the bottom, and I was like, ‘what am I standing on?’ Something squishy and a rock, ‘what is going on?’ [Squeels] [Laughs] The locals rest assured ‘you’re good,’ and I put my trust in them. I was exhausted; the choppy water really exhausted me.
iH: I bet; I couldn’t have done it. That is a testament to the dedication of everyone involved. That is just awesome, it sounds like it was a close-knit group, and eighteen days is just amazing; that is quick!
NW: Honesty for a shark movie it’s insane; it’s not a lot of time. The budget was small, so you couldn’t do much of the stuff you wanted. This is why it was a tight group of people making the most of a situation, I was really proud of it, and we got it out there.
iH: That is great, and has this experience, this move, in particular, made you think about directing?
NW: If I am going to direct anything, it won’t be a shark movie. It is a real baller to take on that project, to be out on the water for eighteen days; you’ve got so much going up against you, it is a challenge. It is funny that you talk about directing; I love music videos old school; I was an 80’s baby; I would love to direct music videos which are completely center-left of ‘ManEater’ and what we are talking about, that would be somewhere I kind of would start. I can definitely appreciate what Justin [Lee], our Director, went through on this movie and the team trying to make this work under the conditions. It was satisfying to wrap up this move and walk away; it was a lot of work, and we were exhausted, but it felt good at the end of it.
iH: I was looking through your IMDB, and it looks like you have an alligator film in the works? The Flood.
NW: Yes, we’ve got shark movies, we’ve got alligator movies; I am taking on every scary animal on the planet. We’ve got The Flood coming out. I’ve got a comedy coming out, which was great to be a part of; I hadn’t been on a comedy set for a minute; it’s called The Nana Project. There is an action movie with Dolf Lungren and Luke Wilson coming out; I have been jumping around doing random projects doing some really different genres as I do [Laughs].
iH: That is awesome. I love hearing that!

NW: It definitely feels good; it’s not the same thing over and over again, that’s for sure.
iH: I know that we spoke about ‘Jaws,’ but what is your favorite scary movie?
NW: Honestly, my favorite scary movie is so hardcore, and I got to work with him: it is ‘House of 1,000 Corpses’ by Rob Zombie, with whom I did Halloween II. I love him; I love his work – that movie. I think I went to the movies and saw it a bunch of times. Old school, absolutely horrifying scary, and I loved it.
iH: I did remember your character very briefly in Halloween II.
NW: Yeah, it was more about getting to work with Rob Zombie. It was a small role. I was like, ‘send me to Atlanta; I want to be in the mix with those great people.’ Rob is amazing at horror; it was so cool, just a badass group of people; that was a good one.
iH: He always does things, he has The Munsters coming out, and I can’t wait for that.
NW: It looks amazing; good for him. He is always taking on projects like that. I love his take on stuff.

iH: Do you currently live in Australia?
NW: No love, I have been in America for sixteen years.
iH: I was just curious, are there any Halloween traditions in Australia?
NW: There really wasn’t. Growing up, Halloween wasn’t huge. People now have jumped on board the whole dress-up thing now. In the past ten years, Australians do Halloweenie stuff; as a kid, we would not trick or treat; that was not part of the Australian culture; it was definitely an American thing. I am a Star Wars nerd, every Halloween, if I am not filming, you’ll see me as some sort of Jedi or with some extreme costume on, really taking advantage of Halloween; it’s my favorite holiday.
iH: That is awesome; I know we have to wrap up; thank you so much for speaking with me; congratulations, and I hope to talk to you soon sometime about a different project.
NW: Absolutely love, thank you very much.
Check Out The Trailer
Movie Reviews
‘And Her Body Was Never Found’ Takes Found Footage Somewhere New
Mor Cohen and Polaris Banks made a film about their real relationship. It opens the way you might expect a film about a real relationship to open, which is to say: uncomfortably.
The film opens on a man masturbating onto his wife’s chest while the two of them sit in a river. This is not a metaphor. Or rather, it is very much a metaphor, but it is also literally happening on screen. He keeps asking her to take her yop off. She doesn’t want to. He keeps asking anyway, because that is what this man does with every limit he runs into, he treats it as a negotiation he is already winning.
This is how And Her Body Was Never Found introduces itself at SXSW 2026. Buckle up.
Two Bodies in the Frame

After the river, the cinematography immediately tells you where you stand. We see the back of her head in close-up, frame-filling, a wall of hair and refusal. He is in the far distance behind her, trying to to keep up. She is not waiting. You read the entire relationship before anyone opens their mouth again.
When they do sit down, she offers him a sandwich. It is a peace offering. It is an olive branch. In the context of this relationship, it is a mistake, because he immediately uses the olive branch to restart the argument. If you have ever loved someone profoundly frustrating, this scene will reach through the screen and grab you by the collar in the most empathetic possible way.
The fight spirals the way real fights spiral, not toward a point but away from one. Semantics get weaponized. He gaslights. The argument rolls over everything except the actual subject. She gets to the point where she raises a stick, and honestly, given the last forty-eight hours, a jury of her peers would understand completely. At the campsite that evening, she tells him she is done. The marriage is over.
The next morning, he says everything right. Every single thing. The full lovebombing playbook: the apology that sounds like he finally gets it, the warmth that feels real, the version of him she fell for showing up right on schedule. Anyone who has ever stood at that crossroads recognizes this moment in their bones. The film does not editorialize. It just watches.
The Cliff Scene

The film’s pivot arrives at a cliff overlook, with something that sounds unmistakably like Wizard of Oz music underneath it. She stands away from the cliff edge, keeping her distance from him. The film makes it clear she is briefly considering how easy it would be to resolve this situation unilaterally. He guilts her onto the ledge through emotional blackmail dressed as a trust exercise.
And then he pushes her.
This is where And Her Body Was Never Found breaks itself open. The take ends. The characters step out. Mor and Polaris are no longer their characters. They are Mor and Polaris, and he is furious about where his hand landed, and she is shaken in a way that does not feel scripted, because it is not scripted, because this part is not the movie anymore. She refuses to continue the scene.
The fourth wall does not just come down here. It gets dismantled and examined.
Blair Witch Country

A cut to night. She is in her tent, filming herself on her phone in vertical format. The frame is narrow and confining. The dark outside is absolute. She says out loud that it would be easy to kill her out here and get rid of the body. Nobody would know.
The Blair Witch Project comparison is not subtle and does not need to be. It is being invoked consciously, as a reference point for what it feels like when the camera becomes the only witness. The found footage mode here is not an aesthetic choice so much as evidence collection, and the film is smart about what that implies.
The film’s formal announcement that it is a meta project, two filmmakers making something about their own fights, arrives here. It reconfigures everything that preceded it without invalidating any of it.
Hat on a Hat on a Hat

This is also where the film begins to strain, just slightly. And Her Body Was Never Found has already broken the fourth wall once, then reconstructed it, then broken it again. Characters comment on the layers. The commentary becomes its own layer.
The film ends somewhere past the point where you can usefully track what is cinema and what is meta and what is real. That disorientation is partly the point. It is also, at a certain moment past the film’s last clean beat, a miscalculation. The movie keeps going after it has already landed.
What Banks and Cohen Got Right

A lot, is the answer. The performance dynamics are precise in a way that indie horror rarely achieves. The cinematography is working on multiple levels simultaneously. The abuse arc is drawn with enough specificity to feel observed rather than constructed, which is not a small thing when both filmmakers are also the subjects.
Polaris Banks and Mor Cohen are making something genuinely new here. Other critics at SXSW noted how cleverly written the film is. That is true. It is also, in places, too clever for its own good, and the film never entirely resolves the tension between those two facts. The overreach at the end does not undo what precedes it. It just means the thing that is most impressive about this project, the willingness to keep pushing the structure past the point of comfort, is also the thing that gets it into trouble in the final ten minutes.
At seventy-five minutes, it is still a tight film that keeps the tension high and earns most of its ambition. The structural risks it takes are real risks, not aesthetic posturing. And the film it is in conversation with, the long tradition of found footage as emotional exposure, is richer for having this in it.
Movie Reviews
The Serpent’s Skin Is Everything We’ve Been Asking Queer Horror For
We need to talk about Alexandra McVicker.
I came into The Serpent’s Skin ready to watch Alice Maio Mackay do her thing. And she does, we’ll get there. But McVicker as Anna stopped me cold within the first ten minutes and didn’t let go. She’s playing timid in a way I haven’t seen done right in a long time. There’s this quality to her where you can feel how carefully she’s holding herself, like she’s protecting something she knows is fragile but real, and every time the camera goes in close you catch it. Mackay leans into those close-ups hard, Obsession-style. The kind of framing where a face becomes its own landscape, and McVicker rewards it every single time. The hope sitting underneath all that timidity is quiet enough that you might miss it if you’re not paying attention. Don’t miss it. It’s the whole movie.

Okay. Mackay. Six features, twenty-one years old, and The Serpent’s Skin is where she lands on the version of herself she’s been moving toward since So Vam. The trans experience isn’t the plot here so much as it’s the weather. It’s in how Anna walks into rooms, in what she’s leaving behind before we even meet her, in what the stakes actually are when the supernatural stuff kicks in. You don’t get a monologue explaining any of it. If you live inside it, you’ll feel the whole shape. If you don’t, you’ll still have a good time, which is the harder trick and the one she pulls off. Her trajectory across these films has been toward exactly this. Trans characters moved from background to center, and now center to core. The Serpent’s Skin is where that project feels complete.
There’s a scene with Danny, where he hits on Anna, and the sexual tension in that scene seeps through the screen in a way that I was not expecting from a Tuesday afternoon screener. The chemistry is real, and it’s uncomfortable, and it’s good. And then Danny transforms, and the makeup team gave him something right out of the Buffyverse practical effects playbook. That same textured ridge work, monsters that feel like they share actual air with the people they’re threatening. The whole sequence recontextualizes everything that came before it. It’s a good piece of filmmaking. The setup earns the scare.

One note, offered with love: there is an intimate scene where someone spits on their hand. I understand the intention. A woman this competent in every other area of her life would carry lube. She should carry lube. This is my only complaint about The Serpent’s Skin and I recognize how good that is.
The whole visual world is neon-soaked in a way that feels deliberate at every level rather than just aesthetic. Every color is a reference or a warning. The festival circuit noticed. They were right.

Here’s what I can’t stop thinking about, though. The Serpent’s Skin is a very good movie that is also, structurally, a pilot. The mythology has room in it. Anna and Gen and the world they’re building has room in it. I want eight seasons of twenty-two episodes. I want monster of the week. I want to watch this relationship grow across years in the same way we got to watch the Winchesters figure their lives out, except this time nobody’s queerness is subtext, nobody’s trans identity is a twist, and the story belongs to them from the start. Give us that show. Someone give us that show now.
But until then we have this, and this is worth your time and your money and the drive to wherever it’s playing near you. Horror has been asking for a film that centers queer women without making the queerness the tragedy, that uses the supernatural as something other than a metaphor for shame, that trusts its audience enough to just tell the story and let us feel it. The Serpent’s Skin is that film. Alice Maio Mackay made it at twenty-one. We should probably all be embarrassed about that, in the best possible way.

Where to see it:
Now playing New York, NY — March 27 | Los Angeles, CA — April 3
Upcoming screenings
- 4/10, 4/11 — Denver, CO — Sie FilmCenter
- 4/11 — Boston, MA — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Boston Seaport
- 4/11 — Chicago, IL — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Wrigleyville
- 4/11 — Dallas, TX — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Cedars
- 4/11 — Denton, TX — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Denton
- 4/11 — New York, NY — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Lower Manhattan
- 4/11 — Yonkers, NY — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Yonkers
- 4/11 — Raleigh, NC — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Raleigh
- 4/11 — San Antonio, TX — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Park North
- 4/11 — San Francisco, CA — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema New Mission
- 4/11 — Santa Clara, CA — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Valley Fair
- 4/11 — Woodbury, MN — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Woodbury
- 4/11 — Naples, FL — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Naples
- 4/11, 4/13 — Denver, CO — Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Sloans Lake
- 4/11, 4/14 — Austin, TX — Alamo Drafthouse South Lamar
- 4/25 — Sacramento, CA — The Dreamland Cinema
- 5/14 — Sebastopol, CA — Rialto Cinema
- 6/8 — Portland, OR — Clinton Street Theater
Movie Reviews
[Review] ‘The Kinderhook Creature: In The Shadow of Sasquatch’ – A Haunting Mystery
Director Seth Breedlove continues his exploration of American folklore with The Kinderhook Creature: In the Shadow of Sasquatch, a quietly unsettling and reflective documentary that blends eyewitness testimony with deeply personal storytelling. Known for his work with Small Town Monsters, Breedlove once again leans into atmosphere over spectacle, delivering a film that feels as much like a character study as it does an investigation into the unknown.
Set in the quiet town of Kinderhook, New York, the film centers on author and radio broadcaster Bruce Hallenbeck, whose alleged encounters with a mysterious upright creature in the 1980s helped shape the legend of the so-called Kinderhook Creature. Rather than presenting the story as a straightforward cryptid hunt, the documentary frames these events through Hallenbeck’s life and experiences, creating a narrative that is both intimate and quietly unnerving.

Breedlove’s approach favors mood and reflection, allowing the weight of the story to build through interviews, recollections, and the enduring impact these encounters have had on those involved. The film also touches on broader paranormal elements, suggesting that the creature sightings may be only one part of a much larger and stranger series of events.
What sets In the Shadow of Sasquatch apart is its restraint. It avoids sensationalism, instead focusing on the human side of belief, memory, and mystery. For longtime followers of Small Town Monsters, the film fits comfortably alongside previous entries like The Mothman of Point Pleasant and On the Trail of Bigfoot, continuing the studio’s signature blend of folklore and grounded storytelling.

While viewers looking for definitive answers may not find them here, the documentary succeeds in presenting a compelling and thoughtful look at a decades-old mystery that still lingers.
The Kinderhook Creature: In the Shadow of Sasquatch arrives on digital platforms March 24, offering a quietly haunting entry that lingers long after the credits roll.
-
News3 days agoThe Evil Dead Burn Trailer Is Here and It Is Everything
-
News7 days agoThis Week in Horror: CinemaCon Delivered, Nicolas Cage Is Coming Back, and Someone Let Ti West Near a Christmas Story
-
News3 days agoThe Evil Dead Universe Now Includes a Mummy Film
-
News4 days agoThe Practical Magic 2 Teaser Trailer Is Finally Here
-
Lists5 days ago10 Horror, Thriller, and True Crime Series to Watch This Spring
-
Trailers2 days ago“It’s My Era. I’m a Rockstar Now.” The Official ‘The Vampire Lestat’ Trailer Is Here
-
News4 days agoThe HUNGRY Red Band Trailer Is Here and We Need to Stop Laughing at the Hippo
-
Editorial7 days ago‘Behind The Mask’ is a Love Letter to Slashers



You must be logged in to post a comment Login