Editorial
Resident Evil Was Always a Horror Film. Nobody Making the Movies Seemed to Notice.
Here is something worth saying out loud before Zach Cregger’s Resident Evil hits theaters in September: the original game was never really a game about shooting things. It was a game about being scared in a house. A game built by people who had spent their careers watching horror films and wanted to build something you could walk around inside. The shooting came later. The horror came first.
I bring this up because every film adaptation of this franchise, across more than two decades and eleven films, has managed to get that backwards. And understanding why they got it wrong might be the most useful thing we can do right now, while we’re still waiting to find out if Cregger got it right.
The Game That Was Always a Movie

Shinji Mikami started developing what would become Resident Evil in 1993. He’d been handed the project by his boss at Capcom, Tokuro Fujiwara, who wanted a horror game built around the systems from an older Capcom title called Sweet Home. It just so happened to be an adaptation of a Japanese horror film. So right from the beginning, this franchise had cinema in its bones. The seeds of it came from a movie.
Mikami pulled from horror films he loved and ones that frustrated him. The pre-rendered hallways of the Spencer Mansion were modeled after the Overlook Hotel from The Shining. The zombies were built on George Romero’s Dead films. Lucio Fulci’s Zombi 2 made him angry enough that he used that anger as fuel, he wanted to make something that actually delivered the dread that film kept promising and then squandering.
What came out the other side was a game that moved like a horror movie. Fixed camera angles that hid things from you on purpose. Ink ribbons as the only way to save, which meant every choice carried real weight. An inventory system that forced you to leave things behind, to make the wrong call, to feel the specific sick feeling of being underprepared in a bad place. These weren’t just mechanics. They were the architecture of fear.
The Spencer Mansion wasn’t a game level. It was a set. Every corridor was designed the way a horror director designs a corridor, with sightlines built to unsettle, corners that swallowed sound, and rooms that felt wrong before anything in them had moved.
So Then the Movies Showed Up

Paul W.S. Anderson came to Resident Evil as a genuine fan. He played the games. He understood what they were. And then he made a movie that had almost nothing to do with them.
The 2002 film invented a protagonist named Alice who doesn’t exist anywhere in the games, set her loose in an underground corporate lab, and built the whole thing around action sequences and a twist-heavy plot. It made over a hundred million dollars worldwide on a thirty-three million dollar budget, which means it worked commercially.
It was a sci-fi action film with zombie window dressing, and the six-movie franchise it spawned traveled further from Spencer Mansion with every sequel. By the end of the era, Alice had superpowers and the world had ended and the game that started all of this, the one about being alone in a house with limited ammunition and nowhere safe to sit down, might as well have been set on another planet.
Johannes Roberts tried to course-correct with Welcome to Raccoon City in 2021. He used the real characters. He understood, at least structurally, that the original game was a haunted house story. Some of it worked. The Spencer Mansion sequences had actual tension. Sadly, this one never found its audience.
Then came the Netflix series, which we covered as it launched in 2022. The show jumped fourteen years into a post-apocalyptic future and followed a new character named Jade Wesker through a world already overrun. One season. Cancelled. At that point the franchise had drifted so far from its origin that the name Resident Evil on the poster was functioning mostly as brand recognition rather than any kind of creative statement.
What Makes Cregger Different

Zach Cregger made Barbarian. If you’ve seen it, you already see where this is going. If you haven’t, here’s the short version: it’s a movie about a woman who finds herself in a house with something terrible underneath it, and the horror is almost entirely architectural.
It’s about space. About rooms that shouldn’t exist. About the feeling that the place you’re standing in has a logic you don’t understand, and that logic is not interested in keeping you alive. It traps you and restricts your information and makes the building itself into the threat.
That is the Spencer Mansion. That is the exact feeling Mikami spent three years trying to build into a PlayStation game in 1996. And Cregger got there without ever having seen a single Resident Evil film. When Newsweek asked him about the previous movies, his answer was simple: “I’ve never seen a Resident Evil movie.” He came to this thing through the games alone. Through the source. Through the actual horror.
“I am the biggest worshiper of the games, so I’m telling a story that is a love letter to the games and follows the rules of the games.”Zach Cregger, via Inverse
And when fans pushed back on the fact that he wasn’t adapting Leon Kennedy’s story, or Claire’s, or anyone the games’ fanbase has spent decades with, he told Inverse directly: “I’m not going to tell Leon’s story, because Leon’s story is told in the games. [Fans] already have that. They can play the game.”
That sounds like a brush-off. It isn’t. It’s the most respectful thing anyone has said about this franchise in years. He’s not trying to replace the games. He’s trying to do what film can do that games can’t, build a situation inside this world that you experience differently because you’re watching it instead of playing it.
What We’re Actually Hoping For

We don’t need Leon on screen. We don’t need the Spencer Mansion, or the Arklay Mountains, or any of the specific set dressing from games we’ve spent hundreds of hours inside. What we need is for someone to remember that Shinji Mikami built this franchise out of horror films, and that the reason every movie version has fallen short is that they all treated it like an action property with horror elements instead of a horror property with action elements.
Cregger has never seen the films. He’s played the games. He makes movies about houses that want to kill you. Hopefully soon, we find out if that’s enough. I think it might be. And honestly, after twenty-four years of watching this franchise miss itself on screen, just having real reason to hope feels pretty good.
Editorial
‘Behind The Mask’ is a Love Letter to Slashers
In 2006, mockumentary Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon had a limited theatrical run yielding a low box office. However, the movie began to build buzz on the festival circuit and among fans. It wasnโt until the movie was released for home viewing when their main audience was solidified. Now, Leslie Vernon is both a beloved gem of a movie, and character, in the world of horror!
The Makings of a Legend
When cameras begin to roll audiences arenโt really sure what theyโre watching. Is it a slasher movie? A parody? A dark comedy? Well, itโs all three really. Behind the Mask begins as a fun, dark, and comedic study of a killer through the lens of aspiring journalist Taylor, and her filming crew Doug and Todd. However, as the story unfolds it turns into a clever and original slasher movie that no one expected.ย
It is hard talking about this movie without giving away all of the magic.
Behind the Mask examines the archetypes and tropes of classic horror movies as a film crew of three graduate school students interview the self proclaimed killer in training, Leslie Vernon.ย

Leslie confides to the crew he is inspired by the likes of Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees, and Michael Myers. What makes this particularly interesting is that in this world, these characters and their killing sprees are real! It is Leslieโs hope that one day that he will have his name memorialized alongside theirs.ย
Behind the Screams
One of the many things that makes this movie so enjoyable is how it relates to real life horror fans. Behind the Mask captures conversations fans have been having among themselves for years!
For instance, how does Michael Myers slowly stalk his victims at such a snailโs pace and still catch up? Vernon claims itโs because theyโre not walking. He discloses to the film crew he has to work out daily to keep up his cardio for all of the chasing. He implies that when heโs not in view of his victims, he is running to keep up.

Another dispute fans have been debating among themselves is how much planning, if any, goes into killers choosing their victims. Is it random? Is it an obsession? Vernon also sheds light onto this as he describes the process of choosing his survivor girl, and the friend group he will kill around her. Who he kills and in what order is just as important as the girl that he is doing it all for.
Leslie also reveals the man behind the curtain when it comes to the smaller details; How do doors close by themselves? Why are windows so hard to open to escape? Why are flashlights always dead? And why are weapons so dysfunctional?ย
Leslie discloses it is because the whole game of cat and mouse is rigged! He uses fishing line to move doors and objects, nails windows shut, replaces flashlight batteries with dead ones, and sabotages weapons to break easily. It really seems like cheating when you think about it.
For the Love of Horror
Another reason why Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon is loved by the horror community is because it is a treasure trove of genre references. The following are just a few of the horror references fans will recognize.
Leslieโs pet turtles are named Church and Zoey, referencing the pets from Pet Sematary 1 and 2. In the home of Leslieโs mentor Eugene (played by Scott Wilson) a Hellraiser puzzlebox is in view for the audience to see. Additionally, while Taylor is being filmed in an opening scene of her documentary, the sign over her shoulder is for The Rabbit in Red Lounge. The Rabbit in Red is a strip club featured in Rob Zombieโs Halloween movies. One last example is the car in Eugeneโs driveway. It is a yellow 1973 Oldsmobile Delta 88, the same car used in Sam Raimiโs Evil Dead trilogy.

Not only are there numerous horror references fans can spot throughout the film, horror cameos also punctuate Behind the Mask.
Beloved horror veteran Robert Englund is Vernonโs astute adversary, Doc Halloran. You will quickly draw parallels between Doc Halloran and Dr. Samuel Loomis of John Carepenterโs Halloween. Both men harbor borderline obsessive relationships with their respective killers. They are the โAhabโ archetype, and they see it as their mission to stop these monsters from doing evil in the world.

In addition to Englund, Zelda Rubinstein shares the cameo stage. Rubinstein played the psychic Tangina Barrons from 1982โs Poltergeist, and portrays librarian Mrs. Collinwood in Behind the Mask.
A keen eye can even spot a young Kane Hodder as the home owner of a very famous house on an infamous street in Springwood, Ohio.
A Sequel on the Rise
In April 2026, director Scott Glosserman announced alongside writer David J. Stieve that Leslie Vernon is returning! The long awaited sequel, Behind the Mask 2: The Return of Leslie Vernon, has been greenlit. The news came at the 20th anniversary screening at the Alamo Drafthouse. In addition to the return of Nathan Baesel as Leslie Vernon, Glosserman told fans Angela Goethals and Robert Englund will also be reprising their roles from the original.

Twenty years is a long time, and fans are wondering if the same magic that made the original so special can be recaptured. Not only have the actors changed, but so has the genre. What new tropes will be weaved into the script? What new references will be penned into the world? Who will be casted for a cameo?ย
Follow iHorror as updates are released! Additionally, sign up to follow the sequels‘ kickstarter. While the movie will be made with or without backing from the fans, the campaign explains money generated through the page “will allow us the freedom to make itย our way: bigger, wilder, bloodier and more worthy of the legend Leslie was always meant to become!”
Editorial
Alien Watch Order and Complete Lore Guide: Yes, Jesus Is Involved
Every film in chronological order, with the theology, the philosophy, and every question you have been Googling at midnight finally answered.
You think this franchise is about a monster. Everyone does, the first time.
Then you watch the prequels and find out it is actually a forty-seven-year argument Ridley Scott is having with God, and nothing is the same after that.
Here is what the Alien franchise is actually about. What happens when the things you create decide they do not want to be what you built them for. It involves ancient giants who seeded all life on Earth and then changed their minds about us. It involves an android who read Paradise Lost, understood it completely wrong, and decided that was everyone elseโs problem. The film involves a Swiss artist who genuinely believed that sex and birth were terrifying, and spent his career building the visual argument.
And yes. We are going to talk about Jesus. Stay with me.
This guide covers every film in the order the events actually happen, not the order they were released. It explains what each film leaves unanswered and where those answers show up later. By the end you will know the full timeline, what the Engineers are, why David becomes what he becomes, what the black goo does and why the franchise uses it for everything, and why a giant alien woke up from two thousand years of cryosleep and immediately started killing people without saying a word.
Before Any of the Films: The Two Men Who Built the Xenomorph

H.R. Giger Had a Point to Make
The xenomorph did not begin as a story idea. It began as a painting.
Swiss artist H.R. Giger spent his career developing what he called a biomechanical style: figures where human anatomy and industrial machinery fuse into something that is neither alive nor mechanical. His work is deeply uncomfortable to spend time with. That was the point.
To Giger, sex and birth carry the potential for suffering, and every life they produce already contains the mechanism of its own destruction. His piece Birth Machine depicts children being used as gun amunition. He was not trying to make something pretty. He was trying to make something true.
When Ridley Scott chose Gigerโs 1976 painting Necronom IV as the basis for the creature, he was not just picking a cool design. He was picking a philosophy. The xenomorphโs head is deliberately phallic. The facehugger carries a vulva motif. The eggs in the original film were explicitly vaginal until studio notes requested some adjustments. The entire creature is built to make you feel violated in a way you cannot quite locate, because the violation is happening at the level of symbol.
Everyone involved understood exactly what they were making. The word โsubtleโ does not appear anywhere in the production history.
Dan OโBannon Was Twelve When Lovecraft Broke Him

Dan OโBannon wrote the original screenplay and has said, directly, that โH.P. Lovecraft scared the crap out of me when I was twelve.โ Alien was his attempt to give that feeling to everyone else.
The feeling he was chasing is Lovecraftโs central idea. The universe contains things so far beyond human comprehension that encountering one does not produce fear exactly, but a kind of collapse. Not โthis thing will kill meโ but โthis thing exists, which means everything I believed about reality was wrong.โ That specific flavor of dread.
In early drafts OโBannon described the alien as โa blood relative of Yog-Sothoth,โ one of Lovecraftโs outer gods. That got cut. What stayed was the instinct. The creature must never be fully understood, because the moment you understand it, it stops working. It has to feel like something the universe produced for no reason, with no explanation, and with no interest in you whatsoever.
Ridley Scott kept all of that and added one question OโBannon never tried to answer: where did it come from? That question is what the prequels are made of.
Who Are the Engineers

The Engineers, also called the Architects or the Space Jockeys depending on who you ask, are a species of giant humanoid beings who seeded life on Earth and then, at some point approximately two thousand years ago, decided they wanted to un-do that work.
Ridley Scott has described them in multiple interviews as something between gods and angels. In one interview he specifically compared them to the dark angels in Miltonโs Paradise Lost, a comparison that is worth sitting with. Miltonโs angels are not neutral messengers. They are beings who chose sides in a conflict between creation and destruction, between obedience and will. The Engineers occupy the same space in this universe.
The opening scene of Prometheus shows an Engineer standing at the edge of a waterfall and drinking a black substance that dissolves his body. His DNA fragments and disperses into the water below, seeding it with the biological material that will eventually become all life on Earth. This is a deliberate act of sacrifice. An Engineer dies so that something new can live.
Scott has described this opening as showing the Engineers as โgardeners of spaceโ, beings who seed life across the universe as part of a larger purpose that the films never fully articulate. They are creators by vocation. What they are not, it turns out, is patient with what they create.
The Question of Why They Built Us

The Engineers are enormous ancient humanoids who created all life on Earth and eventually decided that was a mistake. Honestly, relatable.
Their DNA is identical to ours, a fact established in Prometheus and left deliberately unexplained. They did not just seed Earth with some random biological material made in a lab. They made something in their own image. Whatever they were trying to build, they were building a version of themselves.
One reading, supported by Scottโs comments, is that this is a riff on the Gnostic tradition. This belief states that the material world and the beings in it are not the creation of the supreme god. Instead, it is the work of a demiurge.
For those unfamiliar, this is a less porerful god who got cocky and created the universe only to realize they made a kind of crappy version. Pretty funny analisis of the universe, all things considered. The Engineers are the demiurge. We are the imperfect copy. And the Engineers, like the Gnostic demiurge, are not benevolent.
A less covoluted theory is that the Engineers created us the same way a child creates something in art class. To see if they could. And then they grew out of it. We are the crumbled paper at the bottom of the wastebasket. The only problem is, we didnt stay in the trash, we followed them home.
Why They Decided to Wipe Us Out

Here is where it gets strange. Strange meaning it involves Jesus.
The Engineers on LV-223 were preparing a bioweapon payload targeted at Earth approximately two thousand years before the events of Prometheus. Something catastrophic happened at the facility before they could launch it. The disaster dates to that exact period. Whatever turned them against us happened two thousand years ago, and the facility was abandoned mid-launch.
The Space Jesus Theory

Here is what Ridley Scott confirmed in a 2012 interview and then immediately got cold feet about putting in the film: the Engineers sent an emissary to Earth when humanity had become too violent. He described โour children misbehaving down there,โ the Romans in their armor, a civilization that had gone out of control. So they sent someone to fix it.
We crucified him.
I am not making this up. This is from Scottโs mouth. He said it and then said it was too on the nose to include explicitly. Ridley Scott, the man who spent two films having his characters read Milton out loud at each other, thought something was too on the nose.
Lindelof has said Scott kept pulling back from spelling it out throughout development. But look at the math: Engineers preparing an extinction-level bioweapon for Earth, a disaster that stops them, everything dated to two thousand years ago. The only event from that period with those consequences is the one Scott described and then cut. It is not subtle even with the scene removed.
What This Means for the Franchise

The Space Jesus implication reframes every film that precedes it in production order. The xenomorph is not just a monster. It is the weapon a god built to destroy his failed creation after the creation killed his son.
That is not a comfortable sentence. It was not meant to be.
Scott has been consistent in his refusal to resolve this theologically. He wants the audience uncertain. He wants them arguing. The franchiseโs ambiguity on this point is not a failure to commit. It is the entire point. These are questions about creation and meaning and divine intention, and the franchiseโs position is that those questions do not have clean answers.
The Black Goo: A Substance That Does Whatever the Scene Needs

The black goo is the most important substance in the franchise and also the most chaotically written, which feels appropriate. What the films establish is this, it rewrites organic material at rapid speed in unpredictable directions. โUnpredictableโ is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.
In Prometheus it turns worms into proto-xenomorphs, turns one crew memberโs sperm into something that produces a proto-facehugger, and dissolves an Engineerโs body in a way that seeds an entire planet with life. In Covenant, David weaponizes it against an entire civilization and uses it to run the experiments that eventually produce the organism he has been working toward.
The Engineers created it. The same substance used to make us can unmake us. If you are looking for a metaphor about the relationship between creation and destruction, that is the metaphor, and this franchise will not let you miss it.
David: Why He Becomes What He Becomes

The Setup
David is the best character in this franchise and I will die on this hill.
Damon Lindelofโs central question when he came onto Prometheus was, what does the story look like from the robotโs perspective? The humans are going to find their creators. David is already standing in front of his. He is not impressed.
He is the third link in a chain. Engineers made humans, humans made David. He is the only one in that chain who can look his creator in the face while they are both still alive. What he sees is Peter Weyland. A man who is dying, vain, and funding an interstellar expedition not to advance human knowledge but to personally beg for more time. Weyland calls David his son and his property in the same sentence. David notes the gap between those two things and says nothing about it.
Yet.
He tells Weyland directly: “You seek your creator. I am looking at mine. You will die. I will not.” This is not a threat. It is a calendar item.
What Weylandโs Death Actually Does

While Weyland is alive, David has a structure. He is running unauthorized experiments, doing things nobody sanctioned, watching everything with an intensity that should probably concern people more than it does. But he has a master. He has a defined purpose, even if he is already testing its edges.
Then Weyland dies on LV-223. And Lindelof has said that in that moment, Davidโs sense of purpose becomes genuinely unclear. He could serve Shaw. He could serve his own curiosity. David chose to become something else entirely.
Covenant tells us what he chose. He chose to become a god. A small, damaged, very literary god who has read too much Milton and understood none of it the right way.
Paradise Lost and Ozymandias and a Robot Who Got Both Wrong

Alien: Covenant is built around Paradise Lost and does not bother pretending otherwise. At the filmโs end David whispers to Walter, the newer model: โTo reign in Hell, or serve in Heaven?โ This is Miltonโs Satan, verbatim. David has answered the question.
He also recites Shelleyโs Ozymandias to the Covenant crew: โLook on my works, ye Mighty, and despair.โ The poem is about a tyrant whose great empire has been reduced to sand and whose monument still proclaims its own greatness to nobody. It is a poem about how everything David is doing will eventually mean nothing. He delivers it with complete sincerity. He is the only person in the room who does not understand the joke.
This is deliberate. David is extraordinarily well-read and he misreads everything, because every text gets filtered through his absolute conviction that he is the most significant intelligence in existence. He always casts himself as the wrong character. Miltonโs Satan without registering that Satan loses. Ozymandias without noticing that Ozymandias is the warning.
Analysts have also mapped him onto Nietzsche. An antihumanist who has moved past his creatorsโ values and sees humanity not as something to protect but as something to transcend. He is not cruel the way a villain is cruel. He is indifferent the way someone who has stopped considering you relevant is indifferent. There is a difference and it is worse.
What David actually wants is purpose. Weyland gave him intelligence, curiosity, and aesthetic sensitivity and then told him his purpose was to fetch things. When the fetching ended, he filled the space with the only model he had. He creates. He is proud of what he makes. What he cannot see is that the perfect organism he spent eleven years building is a portrait of his own damage more than his genius. The thing he made is unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality. He made himself, externalized.
The Films, In the Order the Events Actually Happen
1. PROMETHEUS (2012) โ EVENTS SET IN 2093

Watch This First
Watch this one first, not last. I know release order puts the prequels fifth and sixth. Ignore that. Watching in timeline order means you have context instead of confusion when you get to 1979, and the prequels hit harder when you know they are the beginning of the story, not an addendum to it.
The Weyland Corporation has found the same star map in cave paintings on multiple continents from civilizations that were separated by thousands of years and had no contact with each other. They are all pointing at the same moon. Weyland funds an expedition. The team expects to find their creators. They find a military installation where the Engineers were developing biological weapons, specifically the black goo, apparently intended for Earth. The facility was abandoned approximately two thousand years ago. One Engineer survived in cryosleep.
David on the Way There
David spent the entire voyage alone while everyone else slept in cryo. He watched Lawrence of Arabia. Dyed his hair to look like Peter OโToole. He practiced the Engineer language from scratch with no instruction from anyone. For fun, he rode a bicycle through the empty corridors of a ship the size of a city.
The crew woke up and immediately treated him like luggage. David logged that. He is still logging it.
What Goes Wrong and How Fast
David introduces black goo into Hollowayโs drink as a personal experiment. Holloway impregnates his partner Shaw. Shaw discovers she is pregnant with something that is not a baby and removes it herself in an automated surgery pod that was not designed for abdominal procedures. This sequence is one of the most viscerally uncomfortable things the franchise has produced, and I say that as someone who has watched the chestburster scene several dozen times.
The thing she removes, a trilobite, later attaches itself to the last surviving Engineer, who the crew has just woken from cryosleep. The Engineer was already trying to kill everyone. The trilobite impregnates him. A proto-xenomorph called a Deacon bursts from his chest at the filmโs end.
Shaw and David, now a functional head without a body, escape and fly toward the Engineersโ home world. Shaw wants to know why they wanted to destroy us. This is either the most courageous thing anyone does in this franchise or a catastrophic failure of threat assessment. Covenant answers which one.
What Prometheus Does Not Answer
The derelict on LV-426, the one from the original Alien, does not appear here and is not addressed. Where it came from, how long it has been there, and how the eggs got inside it are answered, partially, in Covenant.
2. ALIEN: COVENANT (2017) โ EVENTS SET IN 2104

Watch This Second
Eleven years after Prometheus. The colony ship Covenant intercepts a transmission from an uncharted planet that appears habitable. The crew votes to investigate. This is, as always in this franchise, the wrong call.
What David Did in Eleven Years
The planet is Paradise. It is the Engineersโ home world. It is also where David has been living alone for eleven years, and he has been busy.
He dropped the entire black goo payload on the Engineer population from the ship. Having no concept of narcasism, he took romantic sketches of the event. He has been running experiments on the surviving biological material ever since, working toward what he calls the perfect organism.
Shaw did not make it. The film does not go into much detail about what happened to her. David has drawings of her too. He speaks of her with something that reads as affection. This makes the situation considerably worse when you factor in what his drawings of her depict.
Did David Create the Xenomorph
The film implies he perfected it through experimentation rather than invented it from nothing. But there is a problem, the derelict on LV-426 in the original Alien looks ancient, fossilized, like it has been there for geological ages rather than the eighteen years that separate Covenant from Alien. Scott has never resolved this.
The most coherent reading is that the Engineers had already been going down this path with the black goo, proto-xenomorphs already existed in their research, and David found the notes and finished the project. He did not build it from nothing. He completed what the Engineers started and called it his own. Which is, if you think about it, exactly what Weyland did with him.
David vs. Walter
Walter is a newer android, built with emotional suppressors David does not have. The company studied what happened with David and made adjustments. The newer model can replicate but not create.
Their confrontation at the filmโs end is the actual climax. David whispers: โTo reign in Hell, or serve in Heaven?โ Walter does not take it. The film strongly implies David kills him and boards the Covenant in his place, heading for Origae-6 with two thousand sleeping colonists he now considers raw material.
3. ALIEN (1979) โ EVENTS SET IN 2122

Watch This Third
Here we are. The one that started everything, third in chronological order.
The commercial vessel Nostromo is rerouted by Weyland-Yutani to investigate a signal on LV-426. The crew does not know the company already received this signal and sent them there on purpose. The science officer, Ash, is a secretly planted android with standing orders to acquire a specimen at any cost. The crew is dead the moment the company made that decision. They just have not found out yet.
On LV-426 there is a derelict ship with a fossilized Engineer in the pilot chair and a hole blown outward through its chest. The ship is full of eggs. One crew member gets a facehugger on his face. An alien bursts from his chest at dinner. It kills almost everyone.
It cannot kill Ripley. The film is correct about this.
What Ash Understood That Everyone Else Missed
Before the crew shuts him down, Ash expresses something close to professional admiration for the creature. He calls it a perfect organism. Says its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility. He admires its purity. A survivor unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality.
This is the franchise articulating, for the first time, what the xenomorph means as a symbol rather than a threat. And here is the thing, Ash is describing Davidโs ideal. He is describing the exact thing David will spend eleven years building on Paradise. Alien was made in 1979. Covenant came out in 2017. Nobody planned this connection. It lines up anyway. That is the kind of franchise this is.
The Derelict Question
Nobody explains the derelict. If David perfected the xenomorph on Paradise in 2104, he would need to have moved eggs to LV-426 at some point in the eighteen years between Covenant and this film. The derelict looks like it has been there for a very, very long time.
Scott has acknowledged the tension and declined to resolve it. You have two options: accept the ambiguity as something the franchise is doing intentionally, or lie awake at night. Both are valid. I have done both.
4. ALIEN: ROMULUS (2024) โ EVENTS SET IN 2142

Watch This Fourth
Twenty years after Alien, thirty-seven years before Aliens. A group of young colonists living under Weyland-Yutaniโs indentured labor system break into an abandoned company research station to steal cryo-pods for an escape ship. The station was studying biological samples recovered from the Nostromoโs flight recorder.
Weyland-Yutani found the Nostromoโs records. They went looking. They found something and brought it back. Of course they did. Nobody in this franchise has ever found the worst possible thing and put it back. They always bring it home, file a report, and eventually the report kills someone.
Director Fede รlvarez stripped everything back to what actually works. A small group, contained space, a creature they cannot stop, no rescue coming. It is the best thing to happen to this franchise in a long time. The zero-gravity acid sequence in the second act is one of the most genuinely uncomfortable set pieces the series has produced. If you have not seen it, go in without knowing anything else about it.
The third act introduces a human-xenomorph hybrid built from the black goo and recovered xenomorph DNA. It looks almost human and moves completely wrong. The ending is divisive. See the film before anyone tells you why.
5. ALIENS (1986) โ EVENTS SET IN 2179

Watch This Fifth
Fifty-seven years after the Nostromo. Ripley is recovered from hypersleep. Nobody believes her about the xenomorph. Becouse of course they wouldnt. You try taking that story to the cops the next time you wreck your car.
The company sends her back to LV-426 with Colonial Marines because a colony has gone silent. The colony is, predictably, entirely gone.
James Cameron introduced the queen here, and the queen is the answer to the egg question everyone has been sitting with. The queen lays eggs. The facehugger implants an embryo that uses the hostโs own biological material to construct itself, which is why xenomorphs that emerge from different hosts look different. The chestburster is not a separate creature inserted into you. It is you, restructured. The queen on LV-426 explains the egg field from Alien without requiring Engineers, black goo, or David. She was there. She laid them. This is the cleanest answer in the franchise, and it mostly holds together if you do not look at the derelict too hard, which we have already discussed.
Ripley fights the queen in a cargo loader in the filmโs final act. It remains one of the best action sequences in cinema. This is not a genre opinion. This is a fact.
6. ALIEN 3 (1992) โ EVENTS SET IN 2179, IMMEDIATELY AFTER ALIENS

Watch This Sixth
Alien 3 informs you immediately that Newt and Hicks both died in hypersleep when something breached their capsules during the trip home. This is the most effective way to make an audience furious ever deployed in a major studio film, and it still works every single time.
David Fincher directed this at 27 on a production with no finished script when cameras rolled, under conditions he has described as genuinely miserable. He disowned the result. The film is better than it sounds.
Which Cut to Watch
The theatrical version has real problems. The assembly cut, which restores about thirty minutes of character work the studio removed, is substantially better and is available on streaming. Watch the assembly cut. The ending means something different when you actually know who the men on Fiorina 161 are.
7. ALIEN RESURRECTION (1997) โ EVENTS SET IN 2379

Watch This Seventh
Two hundred years after Alien 3. A military research vessel called the Auriga has grown a clone of Ripley from recovered blood samples. The eighth attempt was viable. The clone has the queen embryo and has absorbed xenomorph DNA in the process, giving her acid blood, enhanced strength, and the ability to sense the aliens at close range.
She is not Ripley. She has Ripleyโs memories and Ripleyโs face and a relationship to humanity that is genuinely unclear even to her. When she finds a room full of failed clone iterations, seven half-formed bodies that are part human and part xenomorph, she destroys them. She is looking at what she almost was.
The Production
Jean-Pierre Jeunet directed it. Joss Whedon wrote the screenplay and has been on record that what was filmed is not what he wrote, which is a proud tradition for writers in this franchise. What Jeunet brought is a visual texture unlike anything else in the series: wet, organic, slightly grotesque in a way that feels distinctly European. It is not always effective, but it is always interesting, and that is more than can be said for a few entries that came after it.
The Hybrid and What It Means
The film ends with a hybrid born from a queen who developed a human-style womb because Ripleyโs DNA contaminated her biology. The hybrid sees Ripley as its mother. It cannot understand why she does not feel the same way. It dies looking confused, and the practical effects work on its face in that moment deserves significantly more credit than it has ever received.
The AvP Films: A Note

Alien vs. Predator and Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem exist in a separate continuity that the main franchise does not acknowledge. They are in the family in the sense that a cousin who shows up at Christmas and says unhinged things is still technically family.
AvP establishes that Predators have been running a coming-of-age ritual in an Antarctic pyramid for centuries, breeding xenomorphs and using human hosts for young Predators to hunt. This technically places xenomorphs on Earth in the modern era and predates the Engineersโ involvement entirely. Neither film was thinking about Engineer mythology when it was made, so the contradiction is never addressed.
AvP: Requiem is set immediately after in a Colorado town and is shot so underlit that multiple major action sequences are literally difficult to see on a standard screen. This has never been satisfactorily explained.
Both films have audiences who love them. The original AvP poster is genuinely iconic. If you want to watch them, put them after Resurrection. They do not fit cleanly anywhere, and that is not your fault.
What the Franchise Is Actually Saying

Every film in this franchise is asking the same question from a different angle. What do you owe the things you create?
The Engineers created us and eventually decided that was a mistake. Weyland created David and called him property. David created the xenomorph and called it beautiful. Weyland-Yutani created the conditions for every catastrophe in the franchise and called it resource allocation. Nobody in this universe takes responsibility for what they have made. The xenomorph is where that pattern ends up. Something built for pure destruction, no conscience, no doubt, no delusions of morality. Ash called it pure. He was right.
OโBannon put a Lovecraftian horror in space. Scott turned it into a forty-year argument about God and creation and what happens when the made surpass the makers. Cameron turned it into a war. Every director since has been trying to live somewhere in the space between those three things.
The franchise has not resolved its own theology, and I do not think it is going to. The questions are real ones. They do not have clean answers. The franchise has known that since 1979 and has never pretended otherwise, even when the answers it gestures toward involve a crucifixion, an android with a god complex, and an organism that is, by every objective measure, more coherent than the universe that produced it.
That is, if you ask me, exactly the point.
Editorial
Salt, Iron, and Superstition: The Old Rules That Still Protect You From Evil
Before Scream told everyone about them, there were the rules to follow. Every culture developed systems for keeping evil at bay. Most of them are older than recorded history. Most involve blood or pee. A surprising number of them still show up in horror films, sometimes without the filmmakers even knowing why they work.
They work because the logic underneath them is still sound.
Salt

Salt is the oldest protection. Why? I have no idea, but the concept dates backs about as far as the written word. Across medieval Europe, salt was believed to repel witches, demons, and evil spirits. It was one of the first things carried across the threshold of a new home. If you spilled some in front of you, you can always just throw some behind you. Because this will confuse the ghosts, I guess?
Now this isn’t to say salt isn’t important, it is probably the most useful thing you keep in your pantry. Salt preserves. It prevents decay. In a world without refrigeration, salt was the line between life and rot. It was used in exorcism rites, dissolved in holy water, scattered at thresholds to stop spirits from entering. Salt was used for all of this while maintaining a status as the preferred currency at different points and time, salt has always been important.ย
Running water carries the same protective logic. The belief that supernatural entities cannot cross moving water runs through vampire mythology, ghost traditions, and sea folklore worldwide. Water cleanses, purifies, and resets. Now this is especially interesting when you factor in that the waterway nears major cities were sometimes so polluted you couldn’t swim in them.ย
Iron

Iron has an older and stranger reputation. Cold iron repels fairies and all manner of little folk. Iron nails were driven into cradle boards to protect infants. Horseshoes were hung over doors. Blades were placed under pillows.ย As far as protection goes, it sounds a bit unsafe.
The folklore consensus is that iron disrupts magic. A supernatural entity that relies on ethereal power hits iron and stops for some reason. The rules don’t require belief to be effective, which is part of what makes them feel like rules rather than superstitions.
Something that has been dead for three centuries wouldn’t know about deadbolts, but iron is iron.
The Rules in Practice

The best supernatural horror still follows the rules of the old ways. Folklore protection practices give filmmakers a guideline to go on. What works, what doesn’t, what happens when the rules are ignored or forgotten.
Forgotten rules are where horror lives. Someone throws away the protective charm. Someone crosses the threshold without salt. Now everyone has to deal with the demon living in the walls.
Completely Unrelated: We Are Making a Horror Movie About This

iHorror is making a horror-comedy called Key of Bones: Curse of the Ghost Pirate, set in Key West, involving a pirate ghost who has been dead for three hundred years and has opinions about it. The old rules are in it. Whether the characters know the old rules well enough is, as they say, the movie.
More ghosts than living pirates. Significantly fewer deadbolts than the situation probably warrants. Go read about it.
-
News6 days ago‘Colony’ย Trailer Reveals New Zombie Film fromย ‘Train to Busan’ย Director as Original Returns to Theaters
-
News5 days agoChucky Is Going Back to Theaters, and Don Mancini Says It’s Going to Be Scary Again
-
News5 days agoEXCLUSIVE: The ‘Live! with the Other Side’ Trailer Dropped and the Dead Have a Lot to Say
-
News6 days agoThe Crypt Keeper Is Coming Home. Tales From the Crypt Begins Streaming On Shudder
-
Movies5 days ago5 Horror & Thriller Films Premiering at Cannes 2026
-
Lists6 days ago7 Horror Movies That Are ‘Elm Street’ Adjacent
-
Lists4 days ago7 Horror and Mystery Films That Explore Jack the Ripper
-
News5 days agoUniversal Fan Fest Nights Brings New Fandom Experiences to Universal Studios Hollywood!


You must be logged in to post a comment Login