[gtranslate]
Connect with us

Editorial

Killing the Shark vs Eating the Protagonist: When Animals Deserve to Win In Horror Movies

Published

on

Maneater

I was asked recently, as an animal person, how I feel about the killer animal genre. First, let me explain โ€œanimal person.โ€ Like many, I’ve always had a tender heart for animals but, in 2003, I saw a film that completely changed how I viewed human/animal relationships. The film, Fast Food Nation, is not a part of the genre I’m going to talk about here, but it kickstarted the feelings that would lead to this article. From there, I have tried my best to learn about animals, treat them respectfully, and avoid exploitation as much as possible. My feelings towards killer animal movies shifted. It didn’t disappear, it just changed a little. How? Well, itโ€™s a complicated relationship.

As a kid, my grandfather never missed a chance to sit me down in front of Monstervision with Joe Bob Briggs or his favorite Harryhausen film. I got accustomed to seeing humans as food for dinosaurs and every strange creature imaginable really quickly. The idea of a monster eating you was the most horrible thing I could think of as a child. Truly the stuff of nightmares. So, naturally I gravitated towards it.

When you took this idea away from the fantastical creatures and applied it to something like a shark it became even scarier to me. Sharks exist. Alligators exist. You canโ€™t reason with them. They arenโ€™t even doing it out of some deeper evil or hate of the human race. They are just hungry, and nature can be a ruthless thing. These animals live everywhere, the sea, the swamp, the mountains. The idea that you could be on vacation and find yourself in the coils of an anaconda or in the claws of a grizzly is one that has kept humans terrified since the beginning of time.

Alligator
Alligator (1980)

It’s interesting to see how storytellers turn these animals into monsters and how that can inform your feelings about their work. I think your relationship with animals and your beliefs on the treatment of animals definitely influences your feelings on the matter, but I also believe both extremes can coexist. At a certain point in my life, I became more aware of the plight of animals, you get to a point where when you watch some of these movies and youโ€™re rooting for them more than the human characters.

I noticed there were certain stories where the animals seemed vilified for no reason other than being animals; other times there are changes to the creature to give it that โ€œmonsterโ€ status. The alligator is a mutant or a prehistoric relic lost in time. The sharksโ€™ are really big or their brains have been experimented on. Sometimes itโ€™s as lazy as changing the color of the whale to white. โ€œLook! Itโ€™s different from the others, itโ€™s a monster!โ€ Always accompanying these grab bag traits comes ultra aggressiveness. The want, the need, to destroy any human in its path. But this is why you can cheer along with Chief Brody as the shark rains down upon the open ocean.

Some choices make a little more sense than others. Sharks, alligators, lions and bears have all been known to take human life. Accident or not, as rare as it is, it happens. But there are movies out there about killer rabbits, frogs, whales. It doesn’t matter if they have teeth or not. The storytellers will think of a way for them to eat you.

Monstro – Pinocchio

The whale in Pinocchio is named Monstro. They literally named it โ€œMonster.โ€ Subtle. It was a giant of the sea with deadly teeth and terrible eyes, swallowing everything in sight with no remorse. There has never been a verified death caused by a whale in the wild. Four people have died from whales in captivity, three of those were from the same whale! Hmm, maybe not a great idea to keep whales captive. Nevertheless, Pinocchio shows us how terrifying sperm whales are when weโ€™re children. The fear is instilled in us. A sperm whale seems like such a weird choice to make a villain and Pinocchio wasnโ€™t even the first to do it. Moby Dick was written in 1851. We donโ€™t have time to dive into all the meanings behind the story but, on its surface, itโ€™s about a man going crazy at the idea of killing a whale.

Moby Dick is treated as a nightmare beast from beyond but…heโ€™s just a whale. Ahab is out for revenge for losing a leg to the great animal but his leg was taken while he was trying to kill Moby Dick for his blubber. This is exactly what Iโ€™m talking about. Weโ€™re shown over and over how terrible and dangerous these animals can be but we ignore that so often the humans are the aggressors. Moby Dick is based on a true story but The Essex, the ship in the true story, was sunk by a whale being hunted. An animal fearing for its life. Sperm whales were being wiped out and just one fought back. The whale is not the one at fault here.

Moby Dick

Maybe as an animal lover I subconsciously want the animal to win no matter the scenario. So many times the humans are jerks anyway. But what about Jaws? You can’t help but to smile at that look on Brody’s face when he realizes he’s not going to die. Even though Steven Spielberg wanted to keep the shark within realistic dimensions, it’s basically portrayed as an underwater Michael Myers. It stalks and kills in a way that sharks donโ€™t actually do. It’s so unrelenting and terrifying that, when it dies, it feels like you’re finally able to breathe. Look, there are hours of content out there explaining why Jaws is a perfect movie and I’m not going to refute any of it. In fact, it’s so well made that it’s probably not fair for me to even be mentioning Jaws here. Let’s move on.

I’m not saying it’s never okay to kill an animal in movies. I’m not saying there should be rules to follow. If it’s going around acting like a monster and the end result is a dead animal, I can live with that. I can put my bleeding heart aside and enjoy a โ€œmonsterโ€ movie. If the animal in question is a menace to Amity Islands economy, then sure, kill the shark. If the alligator is eating entire wedding parties, youโ€™re probably going to have to kill the alligator.

But if the animal is only acting out because of the actions of a human and is just trying to exist in its natural habitat, Iโ€™m going to root for the animal. In my constant consumption of the genre I’ve encountered a few extremes in both directions. Recently, a few of these extreme examples are what got me obsessing over this topic.

I grew up watching Lewis Teaguesโ€™ Alligator. I still have drawings from when I was a kid of the beast and its victims. The animal in this film is a mutant menace. Crashing weddings and destroying city property. It doesnโ€™t matter what real alligators are like because this one is a monster in an alligator’s clothing. This creature hides in swimming pools and eats unsuspecting children. This movie is silly, fun, and ruthless, and the animal is so far removed from reality that it always gets a pass from me. And even though they kill it in the end, they make sure to show us a baby has survived.

Alligator Trailer

Because of this film, I was super excited to read Shelley Katz’s novel, Alligator. Even though there’s no relation to the film, I made the mistake of assuming they would be similar. I bought three copies because I needed the different cover art and had just received the Centipede Press Special Edition. Let me make it clear, Iโ€™m not complaining about Shelleyโ€™s writing. Her more than competent skills transport you directly into the bowels of the swamp, and when the alligator does have its time to shine, itโ€™s unforgettable. My issue is in the narrative. This book begins with the death of two poachers. Come on, you canโ€™t expect me to feel bad about that, right?

As the story progresses your main characters are a group of rednecks that set out to find and kill an animal of record breaking size. And they succeed. Am I supposed to feel good about that? This creature never goes out of its way to eat anyone. Itโ€™s not on a rampage in populated areas, itโ€™s just living its life in the beautiful swamp until men go out of their way to kill it. After 269 pages, when the animal is dead and the poacher is alive, what am I supposed to feel? Is the point of the book that humans suck? If so, point taken.

Or are some storytellers scared to trust the audience to side with an animal over a human being? Am I in the minority? Would most people feel more remorse if the human died and the animal lived even if the human is a walking pile of garbage?

Orca (1977)

That brings me to the 1977 film, Orca. It gave its main character a sympathetic backstory the book didnโ€™t include so the audience would feel better about the absolute jerk heโ€™s been the entire time. The film erases most of his racist overtones but not his sexism. At one point, he insinuates that he will leave the whale alone in trade for sex. This man not only tries to catch the male Orca, he hangs up its mate and watches her give birth to a stillborn calf on the deck of his boat before leaving the mother tied up to slowly suffocate.

The audience is then subjected to watching the poor male Orca scream in heartbreak and agony as heโ€™s forced to watch. And weโ€™re supposed to relate to this man? Sure, the whale goes on to terrorize a village and a few people lose their life (or limbs) in the process, but it all happens because he was provoked! Itโ€™s all because of the actions of Captain Campbell. Heโ€™s the real monster here.

The movie, at least, changes the ending and lets the whale exact his revenge, but not before a scene in which our captain explains that heโ€™s going to look the whale in the eye and tell it how sorry he is. Awww, poor captain Campbell.

Dark Age (1987)

In 1987 the lesser-known Australian film, Dark Age, delivered the gold standard. It features John Jarratt as a park ranger whose job was to work out what to do with a massive crocodile. The local village’s proximity to a water source puts people in danger of becoming a meal. In one of the most memorable scenes, our heroes are too late to save a child from the brutality of nature. But as a part of nature is exactly how the croc is treated by the locals. They respect it. They realize the animal is just doing what an animal does to survive. Again, the poachers are the true villains in this story.

The film pivots to focus on getting the animal to a safe place away from the dangers of the poachers and far enough away from the village so no one else becomes a snack.
This is how a story like this should be told. I can indulge in the horror and intrigue of seeing a human body become food for a completely apathetic creature and also root for that creature’s survival. More of these movies should have this kind of conclusion.

Most of these specific examples are older works but thereโ€™s no lack of modern killer animal movies steadily pumped into our veins. Cocaine Bear also did this right. 95 minutes of a bear eviscerating people, but by the end, youโ€™re rooting for the bear! The animal gets a happy ending even after we watch it rip Ray Liotta’s intestines out.

Ultimately Iโ€™m here for every killer animal book/movie. I want to enjoy them all. I just want them to be smart about it. I want to see an animal rampage and absolutely destroy the local human population, but I don’t want to feel depressed if (or when) the animal dies at the end. It’s a balancing act, maybe one that’s easier said than done.

Some might find themselves asking, โ€œwhy does it matter?โ€ or saying, โ€œit’s just a movie.โ€ Like it or not, as silly as this might sound, some people let movies inform their real life opinions on things. They might take something exaggerated or completely fictional and take it as truth. Research shows that after Jaws was released, there was a 50% decline in shark population. Peter Benchley, author of Jaws, felt so bad about it that he became a conservationist and spent the later years of his life trying to atone. There are probably people reading this that think anacondas are regularly swallowing people but the truth is, that you can buy them at your local pet shop. This places the topic on a whole other level. This is no longer just about making a fun movie, now we’re doing actual damage to wildlife. Is it the job of every storyteller to make sure people know which truth is stretched or made up completely? I don’t think so.

Ultimately it’s on the viewer to do their own research and maybe not take the word of Shark Night 3D. But this is a very real side effect that I don’t think many people think about.

My challenge to you is that next time you find yourself reading or watching an animal making some poor soul its lunch, put yourself in its place. Try to identify the specific traits the storytellers use to change your perception of it. Pay attention to how the humans treat it to begin with. Who’s the aggressor? You might come out of it feeling different about the human protagonists. Or better yet, you might come out feeling different about the animals.

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Editorial

‘Behind The Mask’ is a Love Letter to Slashers

Published

on

In 2006, mockumentary Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon had a limited theatrical run yielding a low box office. However, the movie began to build buzz on the festival circuit and among fans. It wasnโ€™t until the movie was released for home viewing when their main audience was solidified. Now, Leslie Vernon is both a beloved gem of a movie, and character, in the world of horror!

The Makings of a Legend

When cameras begin to roll audiences arenโ€™t really sure what theyโ€™re watching. Is it a slasher movie? A parody? A dark comedy? Well, itโ€™s all three really. Behind the Mask begins as a fun, dark, and comedic study of a killer through the lens of aspiring journalist Taylor, and her filming crew Doug and Todd. However, as the story unfolds it turns into a clever and original slasher movie that no one expected.ย 

It is hard talking about this movie without giving away all of the magic.

Behind the Mask examines the archetypes and tropes of classic horror movies as a film crew of three graduate school students interview the self proclaimed killer in training, Leslie Vernon.ย 

Leslie Vernon (Nathan Baesal) in his full costume, or rather, uniform?

Leslie confides to the crew he is inspired by the likes of Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees, and Michael Myers. What makes this particularly interesting is that in this world, these characters and their killing sprees are real! It is Leslieโ€™s hope that one day that he will have his name memorialized alongside theirs.ย 

Behind the Screams

One of the many things that makes this movie so enjoyable is how it relates to real life horror fans. Behind the Mask captures conversations fans have been having among themselves for years!

For instance, how does Michael Myers slowly stalk his victims at such a snailโ€™s pace and still catch up? Vernon claims itโ€™s because theyโ€™re not walking. He discloses to the film crew he has to work out daily to keep up his cardio for all of the chasing. He implies that when heโ€™s not in view of his victims, he is running to keep up.

Leslie Vernon (Nathan Baesal) applies his makeup before his big night.

Another dispute fans have been debating among themselves is how much planning, if any, goes into killers choosing their victims. Is it random? Is it an obsession? Vernon also sheds light onto this as he describes the process of choosing his survivor girl, and the friend group he will kill around her. Who he kills and in what order is just as important as the girl that he is doing it all for.

Leslie also reveals the man behind the curtain when it comes to the smaller details; How do doors close by themselves? Why are windows so hard to open to escape? Why are flashlights always dead? And why are weapons so dysfunctional?ย 

Leslie discloses it is because the whole game of cat and mouse is rigged! He uses fishing line to move doors and objects, nails windows shut, replaces flashlight batteries with dead ones, and sabotages weapons to break easily. It really seems like cheating when you think about it.

For the Love of Horror

Another reason why Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon is loved by the horror community is because it is a treasure trove of genre references. The following are just a few of the horror references fans will recognize.

Leslieโ€™s pet turtles are named Church and Zoey, referencing the pets from Pet Sematary 1 and 2. In the home of Leslieโ€™s mentor Eugene (played by Scott Wilson) a Hellraiser puzzlebox is in view for the audience to see. Additionally, while Taylor is being filmed in an opening scene of her documentary, the sign over her shoulder is for The Rabbit in Red Lounge. The Rabbit in Red is a strip club featured in Rob Zombieโ€™s Halloween movies. One last example is the car in Eugeneโ€™s driveway. It is a yellow 1973 Oldsmobile Delta 88, the same car used in Sam Raimiโ€™s Evil Dead trilogy.

Graduate student Taylor (Angela Goethals) in front of The Rabbit in Red Lounge.

Not only are there numerous horror references fans can spot throughout the film, horror cameos also punctuate Behind the Mask

Beloved horror veteran Robert Englund is Vernonโ€™s astute adversary, Doc Halloran. You will quickly draw parallels between Doc Halloran and Dr. Samuel Loomis of John Carepenterโ€™s Halloween. Both men harbor borderline obsessive relationships with their respective killers. They are the โ€œAhabโ€ archetype, and they see it as their mission to stop these monsters from doing evil in the world.

Robert Englund as Sam Loomis… I mean, Doc Halloran, in Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon

In addition to Englund, Zelda Rubinstein shares the cameo stage. Rubinstein played the psychic Tangina Barrons from 1982โ€™s Poltergeist, and portrays librarian Mrs. Collinwood in Behind the Mask

A keen eye can even spot a young Kane Hodder as the home owner of a very famous house on an infamous street in Springwood, Ohio.

A Sequel on the Rise

In April 2026, director Scott Glosserman announced alongside writer David J. Stieve that Leslie Vernon is returning! The long awaited sequel, Behind the Mask 2: The Return of Leslie Vernon, has been greenlit. The news came at the 20th anniversary screening at the Alamo Drafthouse. In addition to the return of Nathan Baesel as Leslie Vernon, Glosserman told fans Angela Goethals and Robert Englund will also be reprising their roles from the original.

The title card that sent the horror community into a frenzy!

Twenty years is a long time, and fans are wondering if the same magic that made the original so special can be recaptured. Not only have the actors changed, but so has the genre. What new tropes will be weaved into the script? What new references will be penned into the world? Who will be casted for a cameo?ย 

Follow iHorror as updates are released! Additionally, sign up to follow the sequels kickstarter. While the movie will be made with or without backing from the fans, the campaign explains money generated through the page “will allow us the freedom to make itย our way: bigger, wilder, bloodier and more worthy of the legend Leslie was always meant to become!”

Continue Reading

Editorial

Alien Watch Order and Complete Lore Guide: Yes, Jesus Is Involved

Published

on

Every film in chronological order, with the theology, the philosophy, and every question you have been Googling at midnight finally answered.


You think this franchise is about a monster. Everyone does, the first time.

Then you watch the prequels and find out it is actually a forty-seven-year argument Ridley Scott is having with God, and nothing is the same after that.

Here is what the Alien franchise is actually about. What happens when the things you create decide they do not want to be what you built them for. It involves ancient giants who seeded all life on Earth and then changed their minds about us. It involves an android who read Paradise Lost, understood it completely wrong, and decided that was everyone elseโ€™s problem. The film involves a Swiss artist who genuinely believed that sex and birth were terrifying, and spent his career building the visual argument.

And yes. We are going to talk about Jesus. Stay with me.

This guide covers every film in the order the events actually happen, not the order they were released. It explains what each film leaves unanswered and where those answers show up later. By the end you will know the full timeline, what the Engineers are, why David becomes what he becomes, what the black goo does and why the franchise uses it for everything, and why a giant alien woke up from two thousand years of cryosleep and immediately started killing people without saying a word.


Before Any of the Films: The Two Men Who Built the Xenomorph

H.R. Giger Had a Point to Make

The xenomorph did not begin as a story idea. It began as a painting.

Swiss artist H.R. Giger spent his career developing what he called a biomechanical style: figures where human anatomy and industrial machinery fuse into something that is neither alive nor mechanical. His work is deeply uncomfortable to spend time with. That was the point.

To Giger, sex and birth carry the potential for suffering, and every life they produce already contains the mechanism of its own destruction. His piece Birth Machine depicts children being used as gun amunition. He was not trying to make something pretty. He was trying to make something true.

When Ridley Scott chose Gigerโ€™s 1976 painting Necronom IV as the basis for the creature, he was not just picking a cool design. He was picking a philosophy. The xenomorphโ€™s head is deliberately phallic. The facehugger carries a vulva motif. The eggs in the original film were explicitly vaginal until studio notes requested some adjustments. The entire creature is built to make you feel violated in a way you cannot quite locate, because the violation is happening at the level of symbol.

Everyone involved understood exactly what they were making. The word โ€œsubtleโ€ does not appear anywhere in the production history.

Dan Oโ€™Bannon Was Twelve When Lovecraft Broke Him

Dan Oโ€™Bannon wrote the original screenplay and has said, directly, that โ€œH.P. Lovecraft scared the crap out of me when I was twelve.โ€ Alien was his attempt to give that feeling to everyone else.

The feeling he was chasing is Lovecraftโ€™s central idea. The universe contains things so far beyond human comprehension that encountering one does not produce fear exactly, but a kind of collapse. Not โ€œthis thing will kill meโ€ but โ€œthis thing exists, which means everything I believed about reality was wrong.โ€ That specific flavor of dread.

In early drafts Oโ€™Bannon described the alien as โ€œa blood relative of Yog-Sothoth,โ€ one of Lovecraftโ€™s outer gods. That got cut. What stayed was the instinct. The creature must never be fully understood, because the moment you understand it, it stops working. It has to feel like something the universe produced for no reason, with no explanation, and with no interest in you whatsoever.

Ridley Scott kept all of that and added one question Oโ€™Bannon never tried to answer: where did it come from? That question is what the prequels are made of.

Who Are the Engineers

The Engineers, also called the Architects or the Space Jockeys depending on who you ask, are a species of giant humanoid beings who seeded life on Earth and then, at some point approximately two thousand years ago, decided they wanted to un-do that work.

Ridley Scott has described them in multiple interviews as something between gods and angels. In one interview he specifically compared them to the dark angels in Miltonโ€™s Paradise Lost, a comparison that is worth sitting with. Miltonโ€™s angels are not neutral messengers. They are beings who chose sides in a conflict between creation and destruction, between obedience and will. The Engineers occupy the same space in this universe.

The opening scene of Prometheus shows an Engineer standing at the edge of a waterfall and drinking a black substance that dissolves his body. His DNA fragments and disperses into the water below, seeding it with the biological material that will eventually become all life on Earth. This is a deliberate act of sacrifice. An Engineer dies so that something new can live.

Scott has described this opening as showing the Engineers as โ€œgardeners of spaceโ€, beings who seed life across the universe as part of a larger purpose that the films never fully articulate. They are creators by vocation. What they are not, it turns out, is patient with what they create.

The Question of Why They Built Us

The Engineers are enormous ancient humanoids who created all life on Earth and eventually decided that was a mistake. Honestly, relatable.

Their DNA is identical to ours, a fact established in Prometheus and left deliberately unexplained. They did not just seed Earth with some random biological material made in a lab. They made something in their own image. Whatever they were trying to build, they were building a version of themselves.

One reading, supported by Scottโ€™s comments, is that this is a riff on the Gnostic tradition. This belief states that the material world and the beings in it are not the creation of the supreme god. Instead, it is the work of a demiurge.

For those unfamiliar, this is a less porerful god who got cocky and created the universe only to realize they made a kind of crappy version. Pretty funny analisis of the universe, all things considered. The Engineers are the demiurge. We are the imperfect copy. And the Engineers, like the Gnostic demiurge, are not benevolent.

A less covoluted theory is that the Engineers created us the same way a child creates something in art class. To see if they could. And then they grew out of it. We are the crumbled paper at the bottom of the wastebasket. The only problem is, we didnt stay in the trash, we followed them home.

Why They Decided to Wipe Us Out

Here is where it gets strange. Strange meaning it involves Jesus.

The Engineers on LV-223 were preparing a bioweapon payload targeted at Earth approximately two thousand years before the events of Prometheus. Something catastrophic happened at the facility before they could launch it. The disaster dates to that exact period. Whatever turned them against us happened two thousand years ago, and the facility was abandoned mid-launch.

The Space Jesus Theory

Here is what Ridley Scott confirmed in a 2012 interview and then immediately got cold feet about putting in the film: the Engineers sent an emissary to Earth when humanity had become too violent. He described โ€œour children misbehaving down there,โ€ the Romans in their armor, a civilization that had gone out of control. So they sent someone to fix it.

We crucified him.

I am not making this up. This is from Scottโ€™s mouth. He said it and then said it was too on the nose to include explicitly. Ridley Scott, the man who spent two films having his characters read Milton out loud at each other, thought something was too on the nose.

Lindelof has said Scott kept pulling back from spelling it out throughout development. But look at the math: Engineers preparing an extinction-level bioweapon for Earth, a disaster that stops them, everything dated to two thousand years ago. The only event from that period with those consequences is the one Scott described and then cut. It is not subtle even with the scene removed.

What This Means for the Franchise

The Space Jesus implication reframes every film that precedes it in production order. The xenomorph is not just a monster. It is the weapon a god built to destroy his failed creation after the creation killed his son.

That is not a comfortable sentence. It was not meant to be.

Scott has been consistent in his refusal to resolve this theologically. He wants the audience uncertain. He wants them arguing. The franchiseโ€™s ambiguity on this point is not a failure to commit. It is the entire point. These are questions about creation and meaning and divine intention, and the franchiseโ€™s position is that those questions do not have clean answers.

The Black Goo: A Substance That Does Whatever the Scene Needs

The black goo is the most important substance in the franchise and also the most chaotically written, which feels appropriate. What the films establish is this, it rewrites organic material at rapid speed in unpredictable directions. โ€œUnpredictableโ€ is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

In Prometheus it turns worms into proto-xenomorphs, turns one crew memberโ€™s sperm into something that produces a proto-facehugger, and dissolves an Engineerโ€™s body in a way that seeds an entire planet with life. In Covenant, David weaponizes it against an entire civilization and uses it to run the experiments that eventually produce the organism he has been working toward.

The Engineers created it. The same substance used to make us can unmake us. If you are looking for a metaphor about the relationship between creation and destruction, that is the metaphor, and this franchise will not let you miss it.

David: Why He Becomes What He Becomes

The Setup

David is the best character in this franchise and I will die on this hill.

Damon Lindelofโ€™s central question when he came onto Prometheus was, what does the story look like from the robotโ€™s perspective? The humans are going to find their creators. David is already standing in front of his. He is not impressed.

He is the third link in a chain. Engineers made humans, humans made David. He is the only one in that chain who can look his creator in the face while they are both still alive. What he sees is Peter Weyland. A man who is dying, vain, and funding an interstellar expedition not to advance human knowledge but to personally beg for more time. Weyland calls David his son and his property in the same sentence. David notes the gap between those two things and says nothing about it.

Yet.

He tells Weyland directly: “You seek your creator. I am looking at mine. You will die. I will not.” This is not a threat. It is a calendar item.

What Weylandโ€™s Death Actually Does

While Weyland is alive, David has a structure. He is running unauthorized experiments, doing things nobody sanctioned, watching everything with an intensity that should probably concern people more than it does. But he has a master. He has a defined purpose, even if he is already testing its edges.

Then Weyland dies on LV-223. And Lindelof has said that in that moment, Davidโ€™s sense of purpose becomes genuinely unclear. He could serve Shaw. He could serve his own curiosity. David chose to become something else entirely.

Covenant tells us what he chose. He chose to become a god. A small, damaged, very literary god who has read too much Milton and understood none of it the right way.

Paradise Lost and Ozymandias and a Robot Who Got Both Wrong

Alien: Covenant is built around Paradise Lost and does not bother pretending otherwise. At the filmโ€™s end David whispers to Walter, the newer model: โ€œTo reign in Hell, or serve in Heaven?โ€ This is Miltonโ€™s Satan, verbatim. David has answered the question.

He also recites Shelleyโ€™s Ozymandias to the Covenant crew: โ€œLook on my works, ye Mighty, and despair.โ€ The poem is about a tyrant whose great empire has been reduced to sand and whose monument still proclaims its own greatness to nobody. It is a poem about how everything David is doing will eventually mean nothing. He delivers it with complete sincerity. He is the only person in the room who does not understand the joke.

This is deliberate. David is extraordinarily well-read and he misreads everything, because every text gets filtered through his absolute conviction that he is the most significant intelligence in existence. He always casts himself as the wrong character. Miltonโ€™s Satan without registering that Satan loses. Ozymandias without noticing that Ozymandias is the warning.

Analysts have also mapped him onto Nietzsche. An antihumanist who has moved past his creatorsโ€™ values and sees humanity not as something to protect but as something to transcend. He is not cruel the way a villain is cruel. He is indifferent the way someone who has stopped considering you relevant is indifferent. There is a difference and it is worse.

What David actually wants is purpose. Weyland gave him intelligence, curiosity, and aesthetic sensitivity and then told him his purpose was to fetch things. When the fetching ended, he filled the space with the only model he had. He creates. He is proud of what he makes. What he cannot see is that the perfect organism he spent eleven years building is a portrait of his own damage more than his genius. The thing he made is unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality. He made himself, externalized.

The Films, In the Order the Events Actually Happen


1. PROMETHEUS (2012) โ€” EVENTS SET IN 2093

Watch This First

Watch this one first, not last. I know release order puts the prequels fifth and sixth. Ignore that. Watching in timeline order means you have context instead of confusion when you get to 1979, and the prequels hit harder when you know they are the beginning of the story, not an addendum to it.

The Weyland Corporation has found the same star map in cave paintings on multiple continents from civilizations that were separated by thousands of years and had no contact with each other. They are all pointing at the same moon. Weyland funds an expedition. The team expects to find their creators. They find a military installation where the Engineers were developing biological weapons, specifically the black goo, apparently intended for Earth. The facility was abandoned approximately two thousand years ago. One Engineer survived in cryosleep.

David on the Way There

David spent the entire voyage alone while everyone else slept in cryo. He watched Lawrence of Arabia. Dyed his hair to look like Peter Oโ€™Toole. He practiced the Engineer language from scratch with no instruction from anyone. For fun, he rode a bicycle through the empty corridors of a ship the size of a city.

The crew woke up and immediately treated him like luggage. David logged that. He is still logging it.

What Goes Wrong and How Fast

David introduces black goo into Hollowayโ€™s drink as a personal experiment. Holloway impregnates his partner Shaw. Shaw discovers she is pregnant with something that is not a baby and removes it herself in an automated surgery pod that was not designed for abdominal procedures. This sequence is one of the most viscerally uncomfortable things the franchise has produced, and I say that as someone who has watched the chestburster scene several dozen times.

The thing she removes, a trilobite, later attaches itself to the last surviving Engineer, who the crew has just woken from cryosleep. The Engineer was already trying to kill everyone. The trilobite impregnates him. A proto-xenomorph called a Deacon bursts from his chest at the filmโ€™s end.

Shaw and David, now a functional head without a body, escape and fly toward the Engineersโ€™ home world. Shaw wants to know why they wanted to destroy us. This is either the most courageous thing anyone does in this franchise or a catastrophic failure of threat assessment. Covenant answers which one.

What Prometheus Does Not Answer

The derelict on LV-426, the one from the original Alien, does not appear here and is not addressed. Where it came from, how long it has been there, and how the eggs got inside it are answered, partially, in Covenant.

2. ALIEN: COVENANT (2017) โ€” EVENTS SET IN 2104

Watch This Second

Eleven years after Prometheus. The colony ship Covenant intercepts a transmission from an uncharted planet that appears habitable. The crew votes to investigate. This is, as always in this franchise, the wrong call.

What David Did in Eleven Years

The planet is Paradise. It is the Engineersโ€™ home world. It is also where David has been living alone for eleven years, and he has been busy.

He dropped the entire black goo payload on the Engineer population from the ship. Having no concept of narcasism, he took romantic sketches of the event. He has been running experiments on the surviving biological material ever since, working toward what he calls the perfect organism.

Shaw did not make it. The film does not go into much detail about what happened to her. David has drawings of her too. He speaks of her with something that reads as affection. This makes the situation considerably worse when you factor in what his drawings of her depict.

Did David Create the Xenomorph

The film implies he perfected it through experimentation rather than invented it from nothing. But there is a problem, the derelict on LV-426 in the original Alien looks ancient, fossilized, like it has been there for geological ages rather than the eighteen years that separate Covenant from Alien. Scott has never resolved this.

The most coherent reading is that the Engineers had already been going down this path with the black goo, proto-xenomorphs already existed in their research, and David found the notes and finished the project. He did not build it from nothing. He completed what the Engineers started and called it his own. Which is, if you think about it, exactly what Weyland did with him.

David vs. Walter

Walter is a newer android, built with emotional suppressors David does not have. The company studied what happened with David and made adjustments. The newer model can replicate but not create.

Their confrontation at the filmโ€™s end is the actual climax. David whispers: โ€œTo reign in Hell, or serve in Heaven?โ€ Walter does not take it. The film strongly implies David kills him and boards the Covenant in his place, heading for Origae-6 with two thousand sleeping colonists he now considers raw material.

3. ALIEN (1979) โ€” EVENTS SET IN 2122

Watch This Third

Here we are. The one that started everything, third in chronological order.

The commercial vessel Nostromo is rerouted by Weyland-Yutani to investigate a signal on LV-426. The crew does not know the company already received this signal and sent them there on purpose. The science officer, Ash, is a secretly planted android with standing orders to acquire a specimen at any cost. The crew is dead the moment the company made that decision. They just have not found out yet.

On LV-426 there is a derelict ship with a fossilized Engineer in the pilot chair and a hole blown outward through its chest. The ship is full of eggs. One crew member gets a facehugger on his face. An alien bursts from his chest at dinner. It kills almost everyone.

It cannot kill Ripley. The film is correct about this.

What Ash Understood That Everyone Else Missed

Before the crew shuts him down, Ash expresses something close to professional admiration for the creature. He calls it a perfect organism. Says its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility. He admires its purity. A survivor unclouded by conscience, remorse, or delusions of morality.

This is the franchise articulating, for the first time, what the xenomorph means as a symbol rather than a threat. And here is the thing, Ash is describing Davidโ€™s ideal. He is describing the exact thing David will spend eleven years building on Paradise. Alien was made in 1979. Covenant came out in 2017. Nobody planned this connection. It lines up anyway. That is the kind of franchise this is.

The Derelict Question

Nobody explains the derelict. If David perfected the xenomorph on Paradise in 2104, he would need to have moved eggs to LV-426 at some point in the eighteen years between Covenant and this film. The derelict looks like it has been there for a very, very long time.

Scott has acknowledged the tension and declined to resolve it. You have two options: accept the ambiguity as something the franchise is doing intentionally, or lie awake at night. Both are valid. I have done both.

4. ALIEN: ROMULUS (2024) โ€” EVENTS SET IN 2142

Watch This Fourth

Twenty years after Alien, thirty-seven years before Aliens. A group of young colonists living under Weyland-Yutaniโ€™s indentured labor system break into an abandoned company research station to steal cryo-pods for an escape ship. The station was studying biological samples recovered from the Nostromoโ€™s flight recorder.

Weyland-Yutani found the Nostromoโ€™s records. They went looking. They found something and brought it back. Of course they did. Nobody in this franchise has ever found the worst possible thing and put it back. They always bring it home, file a report, and eventually the report kills someone.

Director Fede รlvarez stripped everything back to what actually works. A small group, contained space, a creature they cannot stop, no rescue coming. It is the best thing to happen to this franchise in a long time. The zero-gravity acid sequence in the second act is one of the most genuinely uncomfortable set pieces the series has produced. If you have not seen it, go in without knowing anything else about it.

The third act introduces a human-xenomorph hybrid built from the black goo and recovered xenomorph DNA. It looks almost human and moves completely wrong. The ending is divisive. See the film before anyone tells you why.

5. ALIENS (1986) โ€” EVENTS SET IN 2179

Watch This Fifth

Fifty-seven years after the Nostromo. Ripley is recovered from hypersleep. Nobody believes her about the xenomorph. Becouse of course they wouldnt. You try taking that story to the cops the next time you wreck your car.

The company sends her back to LV-426 with Colonial Marines because a colony has gone silent. The colony is, predictably, entirely gone.

James Cameron introduced the queen here, and the queen is the answer to the egg question everyone has been sitting with. The queen lays eggs. The facehugger implants an embryo that uses the hostโ€™s own biological material to construct itself, which is why xenomorphs that emerge from different hosts look different. The chestburster is not a separate creature inserted into you. It is you, restructured. The queen on LV-426 explains the egg field from Alien without requiring Engineers, black goo, or David. She was there. She laid them. This is the cleanest answer in the franchise, and it mostly holds together if you do not look at the derelict too hard, which we have already discussed.

Ripley fights the queen in a cargo loader in the filmโ€™s final act. It remains one of the best action sequences in cinema. This is not a genre opinion. This is a fact.

6. ALIEN 3 (1992) โ€” EVENTS SET IN 2179, IMMEDIATELY AFTER ALIENS

Watch This Sixth

Alien 3 informs you immediately that Newt and Hicks both died in hypersleep when something breached their capsules during the trip home. This is the most effective way to make an audience furious ever deployed in a major studio film, and it still works every single time.

David Fincher directed this at 27 on a production with no finished script when cameras rolled, under conditions he has described as genuinely miserable. He disowned the result. The film is better than it sounds.

Which Cut to Watch

The theatrical version has real problems. The assembly cut, which restores about thirty minutes of character work the studio removed, is substantially better and is available on streaming. Watch the assembly cut. The ending means something different when you actually know who the men on Fiorina 161 are.

7. ALIEN RESURRECTION (1997) โ€” EVENTS SET IN 2379

Watch This Seventh

Two hundred years after Alien 3. A military research vessel called the Auriga has grown a clone of Ripley from recovered blood samples. The eighth attempt was viable. The clone has the queen embryo and has absorbed xenomorph DNA in the process, giving her acid blood, enhanced strength, and the ability to sense the aliens at close range.

She is not Ripley. She has Ripleyโ€™s memories and Ripleyโ€™s face and a relationship to humanity that is genuinely unclear even to her. When she finds a room full of failed clone iterations, seven half-formed bodies that are part human and part xenomorph, she destroys them. She is looking at what she almost was.

The Production

Jean-Pierre Jeunet directed it. Joss Whedon wrote the screenplay and has been on record that what was filmed is not what he wrote, which is a proud tradition for writers in this franchise. What Jeunet brought is a visual texture unlike anything else in the series: wet, organic, slightly grotesque in a way that feels distinctly European. It is not always effective, but it is always interesting, and that is more than can be said for a few entries that came after it.

The Hybrid and What It Means

The film ends with a hybrid born from a queen who developed a human-style womb because Ripleyโ€™s DNA contaminated her biology. The hybrid sees Ripley as its mother. It cannot understand why she does not feel the same way. It dies looking confused, and the practical effects work on its face in that moment deserves significantly more credit than it has ever received.

The AvP Films: A Note

Alien vs. Predator and Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem exist in a separate continuity that the main franchise does not acknowledge. They are in the family in the sense that a cousin who shows up at Christmas and says unhinged things is still technically family.

AvP establishes that Predators have been running a coming-of-age ritual in an Antarctic pyramid for centuries, breeding xenomorphs and using human hosts for young Predators to hunt. This technically places xenomorphs on Earth in the modern era and predates the Engineersโ€™ involvement entirely. Neither film was thinking about Engineer mythology when it was made, so the contradiction is never addressed.

AvP: Requiem is set immediately after in a Colorado town and is shot so underlit that multiple major action sequences are literally difficult to see on a standard screen. This has never been satisfactorily explained.

Both films have audiences who love them. The original AvP poster is genuinely iconic. If you want to watch them, put them after Resurrection. They do not fit cleanly anywhere, and that is not your fault.

What the Franchise Is Actually Saying

Every film in this franchise is asking the same question from a different angle. What do you owe the things you create?

The Engineers created us and eventually decided that was a mistake. Weyland created David and called him property. David created the xenomorph and called it beautiful. Weyland-Yutani created the conditions for every catastrophe in the franchise and called it resource allocation. Nobody in this universe takes responsibility for what they have made. The xenomorph is where that pattern ends up. Something built for pure destruction, no conscience, no doubt, no delusions of morality. Ash called it pure. He was right.

Oโ€™Bannon put a Lovecraftian horror in space. Scott turned it into a forty-year argument about God and creation and what happens when the made surpass the makers. Cameron turned it into a war. Every director since has been trying to live somewhere in the space between those three things.

The franchise has not resolved its own theology, and I do not think it is going to. The questions are real ones. They do not have clean answers. The franchise has known that since 1979 and has never pretended otherwise, even when the answers it gestures toward involve a crucifixion, an android with a god complex, and an organism that is, by every objective measure, more coherent than the universe that produced it.

That is, if you ask me, exactly the point.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Salt, Iron, and Superstition: The Old Rules That Still Protect You From Evil

Published

on

Before Scream told everyone about them, there were the rules to follow. Every culture developed systems for keeping evil at bay. Most of them are older than recorded history. Most involve blood or pee. A surprising number of them still show up in horror films, sometimes without the filmmakers even knowing why they work.

They work because the logic underneath them is still sound.

Salt

Salt is the oldest protection. Why? I have no idea, but the concept dates backs about as far as the written word.  Across medieval Europe, salt was believed to repel witches, demons, and evil spirits. It was one of the first things carried across the threshold of a new home. If you spilled some in front of you, you can always just throw some behind you. Because this will confuse the ghosts, I guess?

Now this isn’t to say salt isn’t important, it is probably the most useful thing you keep in your pantry. Salt preserves. It prevents decay. In a world without refrigeration, salt was the line between life and rot. It was used in exorcism rites, dissolved in holy water, scattered at thresholds to stop spirits from entering. Salt was used for all of this while maintaining a status as the preferred currency at different points and time, salt has always been important.ย 

Running water carries the same protective logic. The belief that supernatural entities cannot cross moving water runs through vampire mythology, ghost traditions, and sea folklore worldwide. Water cleanses, purifies, and resets. Now this is especially interesting when you factor in that the waterway nears major cities were sometimes so polluted you couldn’t swim in them.ย 

Iron

Iron has an older and stranger reputation. Cold iron repels fairies and all manner of little folk. Iron nails were driven into cradle boards to protect infants. Horseshoes were hung over doors. Blades were placed under pillows.ย As far as protection goes, it sounds a bit unsafe.

The folklore consensus is that iron disrupts magic. A supernatural entity that relies on ethereal power hits iron and stops for some reason. The rules don’t require belief to be effective, which is part of what makes them feel like rules rather than superstitions.

Something that has been dead for three centuries wouldn’t know about deadbolts, but iron is iron.

The Rules in Practice

The best supernatural horror still follows the rules of the old ways. Folklore protection practices give filmmakers a guideline to go on. What works, what doesn’t, what happens when the rules are ignored or forgotten.

Forgotten rules are where horror lives. Someone throws away the protective charm. Someone crosses the threshold without salt. Now everyone has to deal with the demon living in the walls.

Completely Unrelated: We Are Making a Horror Movie About This

iHorror is making a horror-comedy called Key of Bones: Curse of the Ghost Pirate, set in Key West, involving a pirate ghost who has been dead for three hundred years and has opinions about it. The old rules are in it. Whether the characters know the old rules well enough is, as they say, the movie.

More ghosts than living pirates. Significantly fewer deadbolts than the situation probably warrants. Go read about it.

Continue Reading