Connect with us

True Crime

Interview: Filmmaker Christina Fontana on Her ‘Relentless’ True Crime Docuseries

Published

on

Relentless

When 21-year-old Christina Whittaker disappeared in the small town of Hannibal, MO, a frantic search immediately ensued. Eight months later, filmmaker Christina Fontana met Whittaker’s mother when filming a documentary about the families of missing persons. Little did Fontana know, this one case would lead her down a dark path full of conspiracies, betrayals, suicide, and murder. Fontana documents her involvement in Whittaker’s case in the 6-part docuseries, Relentless

Using more than 400 hours of footage from field investigations and video diaries filmed over 11 years, this docuseries follows not only a complex search for a missing person, but the journey of a filmmaker who becomes dangerously ensnared by the story she’s documenting.

I had the opportunity to sit down with Fontana to discuss Relentless, her decade-long involvement in the case, and the challenges of being so personally involved. Produced by Blumhouse Television in association with Stick Figure Entertainment and streaming on discovery+, Relentless is a twisting, turning, emotionally charged case full of danger and deceit. 


Kelly McNeely: Hello! How are you?

Christina Fontana: I’m doing well. It’s been a surreal 24 hours now that Relentless has finally dropped. It’s been such a long journey for me. So finally, being able to share with audiences is thrilling. It’s very exciting to get it out there.

Kelly McNeely: I saw the first three episodes, and I cannot wait to watch the rest because it’s such an absolutely crazy, twisting case. Can you talk a little bit about your involvement and perhaps how it’s evolved over time, both personally and professionally?

Christina Fontana: Yeah, this story started out in 2007, I was doing a documentary on families of the missing. I was interested in what it was like for families who had to carry the weight of their own investigations, and what it was like for them to be able to go to work and also do that. And I met Christina’s parents in the summer of 2010 — at a retreat for families of the missing — and I was really taken by the dedication and tenacity of Christina’s mother, to look for her and the active leads that they had. 

So originally, this was supposed to be a story among other stories, and all of a sudden, all of the focus shifted to Christina’s case, because Christina’s mom had leads, and they tracked her to this town 200 miles away from where they lived. And it kind of became a thrill thrill ride from there. And yeah, I mean, obviously, you’ve seen it develop to a degree in the first three episodes, and I’ll say that the last three episodes get pretty crazy. It’s really a thrill ride. 

Kelly McNeely: You’ve spoken with a few people throughout this process that have been perhaps not entirely truthful with you during their interviews. As an interviewer, what runs through your head when you know someone’s lying to you, and how do you navigate those conversations?

Christina Fontana: It’s actually pretty difficult, because what’s interesting about this story, for me, is that I dove in headfirst in the beginning based solely on Christina’s mom’s tenacity to look for her. And, you know, she needed some help. And I wanted to be somebody that was there for her. And I realized that that was naive, and I wasn’t always being objective. So the reason why I do the diary cams in Relentless is because I wanted the audience to know what I was feeling during those moments, when I was getting information thrown at me that they may be lying to you, or hiding certain pieces of information, and how hard that was for me to grapple with. Because I went into this on their side. 

And it was difficult to kind of push through that and say, okay, you really need to put all the information out there. Otherwise, you’re going to be trying to put a puzzle together without all the pieces. So it was difficult for me, because the more I uncover in Relentless, the more complicated my relationship with the family. And I always wanted to be kind in the way I approached them when I found, you know, certain pieces of information out. There’s a lot of rumors in this case, and there were a lot of rumors in this town. So I wasn’t always sure what was real and what wasn’t.

Kelly McNeely: I imagine that’d be a very difficult part, just because there’s so much hearsay back and forth between different friends and family members, and people that knew her and people that didn’t… could you talk a little bit about trying to do that detective work of digging through to try and find the facts through all the back and forth?

Christina Fontana: Yeah, you know, that’s why I realized that I needed help with investigators. And I actually bring on even more investigators in the final three episodes, because it was such a difficult case to navigate. And there are specific allegations of corruption that go on within Hannibal that was too big for me to handle, I needed professional help. So a lot of the detective work was thankfully, guided by the law enforcement officials that I brought on my team, because it was a lot of emotion for me, dealing with all of the lies and deceit, manipulation and danger. I mean, I kept putting myself in situations where I felt in danger. And navigating through all of that wouldn’t have happened if I did not have the team that I had. So they were a great help. They understood the town, and they understood the certain allegations that were going around.

Kelly McNeely: And I think that sort of makes a great segue to my next question, what do you think was the best decision that you made when investigating all of this? Whether it was bringing all the other team members, or was there a decision that you made that you’re like, I’m so glad I did this one particular thing because it’s really helped me along the process?

Christina Fontana: I have to say that I brought on a really amazing showrunner, George Moll, who comes from a journalism background. And I think that is one of the smartest decisions I’ve made, because even though I had investigators, having somebody on a day to day basis who was able to look at it from many different angles — particularly because I was so entrenched, I became a part of the story. So it was hard for me sometimes to take a step back and say, okay, how do we look at this objectively? Because some of the people that are lying to you are your friends, you think, so it was really nice for me to have George creatively and investigatively. He just brought a lot to the table.

Kelly McNeely: The whole thing seems like it was just an emotional roller coaster, was there ever a point that you wanted to just stop the investigation? To say, I have to step away from this? 

Christina Fontana: Yeah. The end of episode 5 is a very emotional moment that you’ll see. And particularly when the case hit 10 years, I was at my wit’s end. And I kept asking myself, why am I doing this, despite everything that’s coming at me, and I kept remembering that the reason I joined the search was to find justice for Christina [Whittaker]. When I agreed to join the search, I didn’t agree with strings attached. I didn’t agree to help, you know, if no one lied to me, or if everybody wasn’t a really good person. It was about Christina, and helping her little girl find that closure, or get reunited with her mom. So that was the thing that kept driving me to continue.

Kelly McNeely: You had such a close connection with the family. And this may get answered in later episodes. But do you still keep in touch with anyone from the family? Has there been any follow up with [Whittaker’s] daughter at all?

Christina Fontana: Yeah, the family welcomed me with open arms in the beginning, and it gets complicated. And I think to a large degree, they understand the complications that arose from this journey. And I think one of the lessons that you’ll find in Relentless is that there are a lot of unintended consequences when a family has to take control of their own investigation.

Families are not objective, they have a natural tendency to want to protect each other, protect each other from judgment, and a natural fear of parents that if they do get judged that no one will want to help. So I know that there is a lot of raw emotion based on things that we uncover. But I had to remain true to the story. Anything that was relevant to the case, because that could be the thing that brings Christina home. So we we do keep in touch, and we’re trying to keep our focus on finding Christina.

Kelly McNeely: This is a bit of a long process that you’ve taken us on over so many years. Can you talk a little bit about the journey from beginning to end and how it feels to be done everything now? I guess the case is still ongoing, but to have this final project of Relentless completed?

Christina Fontana: Yeah, I mean, it’s such a surreal feeling. I had started the project again, on these other families and how it grew into Christina’s case, and the effect that it had on my life was pretty significant. Emotionally, and I get very raw about that. And again, in the in the final three episodes, it increases because everything that’s coming at me increases, and Christina Whittaker has become a part of me. 

I’ve never met her, you know, but she has been in my thoughts, I get these leads, you know, at work, at the gym, at home, it’s just been a part of my life, and to see it and to be able to finally share the story with true crime audiences at discovery+ especially is exciting for me, because I know that they’re just as passionate and stubborn as I am, that we’re not going to give up until we get justice for Christina. 

So on the one hand, I want to say it is a relief that I finally am able to get this out there. It’s exciting to say okay, what do you guys think? And you know, I’ve been getting leads even the first three episodes that drop, my phone has been ringing with people who are coming forward in the case. And that’s my hope. And my hope is that people with direct knowledge of what happened to Christina see the people who are brave enough who have come forward, and that’ll inspire them to say, okay, I’m not alone. It’s time, let’s do this. So it certainly gives it a lot more. 

[Fontana’s phone rings, she quickly checks it]

That was a lead from Hannibal, by the way. 

Kelly McNeely: That was Hannibal Missouri calling? Is it like all hours of the day?

Christina Fontana: They’re calling all hours of the day. That’s what happens. All day, I’ll get calls and messages from people in Hannibal that want to share information that they know, because they think it might help. And I welcome that. 

Kelly McNeely: Has true crime always been an interest for you? Or did it really start with this case? How did you get this interest in the detective work that you’ve developed over the process of working on Relentless?

Christina Fontana: My favorite cartoon as a kid was Scooby Doo. So I don’t know if it started there. And I’ve always been very interested in mysteries. I think my passion was in documentaries because I just think there are certain stories in life that are just, like, life is crazier than fiction, right? It’s just incredible, the true stories that you can find out there. And I wanted to do this documentary, because I had a passion for if I could do something that at least could affect someone’s life in a positive way, and also use the medium that I love — which is film — that would be super cool. So that’s why I kind of got into this. But yeah, figuring things out, the mystery of it all, is something that has always interested me, I think.

Kelly McNeely: Is it something you want to continue to pursue, maybe with other stories now that you’ve sort of gotten your feet wet with this really crazy case?

Christina Fontana: Yeah, you know, I’ve been keeping up with a lot of the families of the missing that I was meeting in the very beginning of this process. And I’ve met a lot of incredible families since. And all of them are being relentless in their own cases, whether they’re trying to find justice for their murdered — missing or murdered — loved one, or missing person. And I’d like to share those stories. I think it’s really valuable to get all of their stories out there. So I am looking at things like that. And discovery+ is an amazing place to be, because they’re very interested in justice and also getting these stories out. So yeah, it’s my hope to share as many as I can.

 

The first three episodes of Relentless stream exclusively on discovery+ beginning June 28th, and subsequent episodes drop every Monday. For more true crime content, you can read my interview with producer Jacqueline Bynon on The Clown and the Candyman

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Woman Brings Corpse Into Bank To Sign Loan Papers

Published

on

Warning: This is a disturbing story.

You have to be pretty desperate for money to do what this Brazilian woman did at the bank to get a loan. She wheeled in a fresh corpse to endorse the contract and she seemingly thought the bank employees wouldn’t notice. They did.

This weird and disturbing story comes via ScreenGeek an entertainment digital publication. They write that a woman identified as Erika de Souza Vieira Nunes pushed a man she identified as her uncle into the bank pleading with him to sign loan papers for $3,400. 

If you’re squeamish or easily triggered, be aware that the video captured of the situation is disturbing. 

Latin America’s largest commercial network, TV Globo, reported on the crime, and according to ScreenGeek this is what Nunes says in Portuguese during the attempted transaction. 

“Uncle, are you paying attention? You must sign [the loan contract]. If you don’t sign, there’s no way, as I cannot sign on your behalf!”

She then adds: “Sign so you can spare me further headaches; I can’t bear it any longer.” 

At first we thought this might be a hoax, but according to Brazilian police, the uncle, 68-year-old Paulo Roberto Braga had passed away earlier that day.

 “She attempted to feign his signature for the loan. He entered the bank already deceased,” Police Chief Fábio Luiz said in an interview with TV Globo. “Our priority is to continue investigating to identify other family members and gather more information regarding this loan.”

If convicted Nunes could be facing jail time on charges of fraud, embezzlement, and desecration of a corpse.

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Continue Reading

Trailers

HBO’s “The Jinx – Part Two” Unveils Unseen Footage and Insights Into Robert Durst Case [Trailer]

Published

on

the jinx

HBO, in collaboration with Max, has just released the trailer for “The Jinx – Part Two,” marking the return of the network’s exploration into the enigmatic and controversial figure, Robert Durst. This six-episode docuseries is set to premiere on Sunday, April 21, at 10 p.m. ET/PT, promising to unveil new information and hidden materials that have emerged in the eight years following Durst’s high-profile arrest.

The Jinx Part Two – Official Trailer

“The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst,” the original series directed by Andrew Jarecki, captivated audiences in 2015 with its deep dive into the life of the real estate heir and the dark cloud of suspicion surrounding him in connection with several murders. The series concluded with a dramatic turn of events as Durst was apprehended for the murder of Susan Berman in Los Angeles, just hours before the final episode was broadcast.

The forthcoming series, “The Jinx – Part Two,” aims to delve deeper into the investigation and trial that unfolded in the years after Durst’s arrest. It will feature never-before-seen interviews with Durst’s associates, recorded phone calls, and interrogation footage, offering an unprecedented look into the case.

Charles Bagli, a journalist for the New York Times, shared in the trailer, “As ‘The Jinx’ aired, Bob and I spoke after every episode. He was very nervous, and I thought to myself, ‘He’s gonna run.’” This sentiment was mirrored by District Attorney John Lewin, who added, “Bob was gonna flee the country, never to return.” However, Durst did not flee, and his arrest marked a significant turning point in the case.

The series promises to showcase the depth of Durst’s expectation for loyalty from his friends while he was behind bars, despite facing serious charges. A snippet from a phone call where Durst advises, “But you don’t tell them s–t,” hints at the complex relationships and dynamics at play.

Andrew Jarecki, reflecting on the nature of Durst’s alleged crimes, stated, “You don’t kill three people over 30 years and get away with it in a vacuum.” This commentary suggests the series will explore not only the crimes themselves but the broader network of influence and complicity that may have enabled Durst’s actions.

Contributors to the series include a wide range of figures involved in the case, such as Deputy District Attorneys of Los Angeles Habib Balian, defense attorneys Dick DeGuerin and David Chesnoff, and journalists who have covered the story extensively. The inclusion of judges Susan Criss and Mark Windham, as well as jury members and friends and associates of both Durst and his victims, promises a comprehensive perspective on the proceedings.

Robert Durst himself has commented on the attention the case and the documentary have garnered, stating he is “getting his own 15 minutes [of fame], and it is gargantuan.”

“The Jinx – Part Two” is anticipated to offer an insightful continuation of Robert Durst’s story, revealing new facets of the investigation and trial that have not been seen before. It stands as a testament to the ongoing intrigue and complexity surrounding Durst’s life and the legal battles that followed his arrest.

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Continue Reading

Trailers

Hulu Unveils Riveting Trailer for True Crime Series “Under the Bridge”

Published

on

Under the Bridge

Hulu has just released a gripping trailer for its latest true crime series, “Under the Bridge,” drawing viewers into a haunting narrative that promises to explore the dark corners of a real-life tragedy. The series, which premieres on April 17th with the first two of its eight episodes, is based on the best-selling book by the late Rebecca Godfrey, providing a detailed account of the 1997 murder of fourteen-year-old Reena Virk near Victoria, British Columbia.

Riley Keough (left) and Lily Gladstone in “Under the Bridge”. 

Starring Riley Keough, Lily Gladstone, and Vritika Gupta, “Under the Bridge” brings to life the chilling story of Virk, who disappeared after attending a party with friends, never to return home. Through the investigative lens of author Rebecca Godfrey, played by Keough, and a dedicated local police officer portrayed by Gladstone, the series delves into the hidden lives of the young girls accused of Virk’s murder, uncovering shocking revelations about the true perpetrator behind this heinous act. The trailer offers a first look at the series’ atmospheric tension, showcasing the exceptional performances of its cast. Watch the trailer below:

Under the Bridge Official Trailer

Rebecca Godfrey, who passed away in October 2022, is credited as an executive producer, having worked closely with Shephard for over two years to bring this complex story to television. Their partnership aimed to honor Virk’s memory by casting a light on the circumstances that led to her untimely death, offering insight into the societal and personal dynamics at play.

“Under the Bridge” looks to stand out as a compelling addition to the true crime genre with this gripping story. As Hulu prepares to release the series, audiences are invited to brace themselves for a deeply moving and thought-provoking journey into one of Canada’s most notorious crimes.

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Listen to the 'Eye On Horror Podcast'

Continue Reading