Connect with us

News

The “Warlock Collection” Has Us Spellbound

Published

on

Written by Shannon McGrew

The “Warlock” films are the perfect example of those movies that seem to have amassed quite a cult following since the first ones release in 1989, and just like when I reviewed the “Wishmaster” series, the “Warlock” films seem to have always flown under my radar. That being said, when I had the opportunity to review Vestron Video’s latest release, the “Warlock Collection”, I jumped at the chance and prepared myself for the onslaught of entertainment I was going to experience.

The first film in this installment, “Warlock”, is directed by Steve Miner and stars Julian Sands, as the Warlock, Lori Singer and Richard E. Grant. The film centers around a dangerous and powerful Warlock who has used his magic to escape the 17th century, landing him straight into the 20th century, where he finds himself being pursued by a determined witch-hunter (Grant). Though I didn’t end up loving this film, I did appreciate a lot of what it had to offer. Julian Sands, for one, does an exceptional job of bringing the Warlock to life and I found myself very drawn to his character and his ability to be somewhat charming (when he wasn’t trying to kill you).

In regards to the special effects, well, it’s the 80s, so I’m sure you can imagine the quality that was presented. Though the effects were sub-par at best, what I did really like was the animated fire that they used in place of real fire. At first I thought it was kind of cheesy, but ultimately something about it grew on me and it seemed to fit perfectly in place as a quirky addition to the film. I also found the moments where the Warlock was flying to be exceptionally hilarious since the special effects didn’t really make the Warlock fly so much as he kind of just hovered in the air. I’m sure the budget for the film didn’t allow for over the top special effects but maybe they should not have made the Warlock fly so that it wouldn’t look so ridiculous when he did.

Overall, “Warlock” had some quality moments and I really enjoyed Julian Sands and Richard Grant’s performances but all in all, the first film didn’t really do much for me. In 1993, audiences got to experience the second film in the series, “Warlock: The Armageddon.” This time the film saw a new director, Anthony Hickox, but made sure to bring back Julian Sands to portray the Warlock. The central story in this film centered on two adults who learn that their families were part of the Druids in which their destiny is to battle the Warlock before he unleashes Satan upon the world with the use of six mystic rune stones.

I’m happy to report that this film was MUCH better than the previous. One of my favorite scenes happens early on where we witness the rebirth of Warlock and it’s quite a bloody mess, which really sets the tone for the rest of the film. Julian Sands is once again fantastic as the Warlock and even brings a bit more edge to the character. Chris Young and Paula Marshall play the children who learn their families are part of a Druid lineage and though their acting is a bit dramatic, I still enjoyed their performances and creativity towards trying to defeat the Warlock.

Luckily, the special effects were better this time around; however, what was very noticeable were the on-camera blunders by the crew who were doing things in the background that weren’t edited out. For example, we are led to believe that Kenny (Young) has used his mind-powers to start a car in hopes of it running over the Warlock. However you can see that someone was clearly driving the car as their hair was sticking up above the dashboard. Though that could be easily brushed off, the most noticeable offense was when the Warlock was showing his strength in toppling over an incredibly large rock formation, only for there to be part of the crew pushing on the fake rock with him.

Though these slip-ups could be looked down upon, a part of me found them to be very humanizing. It takes a village to put together a film and these glimpses of the crew really showed that. Overall, “Warlock: The Armageddon” is one of those rare cases where I felt the sequel was better than its predecessor. Sure, there were corny moments and the acting left a lot to be desired but I felt like this film had more heart than the one before and definitely the one after. Out of all three movies, “Warlock: The Armageddon” is definitely my favorite.

“Warlock III: The End of Innocence”, is the last piece of this trilogy and it came out six years after the last one. Again, this film finds itself a new director, Eric Freiser, but also a new Warlock, played by Bruce Payne. This film pretty much hits all the classic cliches one would expect from a late-90’s horror film and I have to admit, I kind of loved that about the movie. This time, the story focuses on a college student who learns that she has inherited a run-down house that is going to soon be demolished. With the help of her friends, she goes there to collect any remaining heirlooms only to be targeted by the powerful Warlock who’s interested in her bloodline.

Fans of the “Hellraiser” films will be happy to see a familiar face as this movie stars none other than Ashley Laurence. In terms of most of the acting, everyone was about average, nothing too memorable, with the exception of Bruce Payne. When I watched the “Wishmaster” series, I was super bummed when they replaced Andrew Divoff, but in “Warlock III” I was actually incredibly surprised with how much I enjoyed Bruce Payne’s performance! In all honesty, he was probably the best part of the film and really made the Warlock character unique to his style. If anything, if I had to watch this film again it would be for his performance alone.

There’s not a whole lot to say about this film. It runs the typical gambit of young adults trapped in a creepy house during a storm who are then attacked by a supernatural/otherworldly being and are killed. I will admit that some of the kills were interesting and the special effects are way above that of the first film, but other than that, there isn’t too much to discuss. As I mentioned above, the only shining light was Bruce Payne’s performance and without that, this is a film that could easily be forgotten, even with all the late 90s cliches. Overall, I enjoyed “Warlock III” for what it was, but I don’t think they’ll be a time in the near future where I need to revisit the film again.

So there you have it, my review of all the “Warlock” films! If you are a fan of 80s horror films and enjoy cheesy special effects and even cheesier acting, I highly suggest picking up this limited edition collection from Vestron Video before they are all gone!

 

 

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Lists

Thrills and Chills: Ranking ‘Radio Silence’ Films from Bloody Brilliant to Just Bloody

Published

on

Radio Silence Films

Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, Tyler Gillett, and Chad Villella are all filmmakers under the collective label called Radio Silence. Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett are the primary directors under that moniker while Villella produces.

They have gained popularity over the past 13 years and their films have become known as having a certain Radio Silence “signature.” They are bloody, usually contain monsters, and have breakneck action sequences. Their recent film Abigail exemplifies that signature and is perhaps their best film yet. They are currently working on a reboot of John Carpenter’s Escape From New York.

We thought we would go through the list of projects they have directed and rank them from high to low. None of the movies and shorts on this list are bad, they all have their merits. These rankings from top to bottom are just ones we felt showcased their talents the best.

We didn’t include movies they produced but didn’t direct.

#1. Abigail

An update to the second film on this list, Abagail is the natural progression of Radio Silence’s love of lockdown horror. It follows in pretty much the same footsteps of Ready or Not, but manages to go one better — make it about vampires.

Abigail

#2. Ready or Not

This film put Radio Silence on the map. While not as successful at the box office as some of their other films, Ready or Not proved that the team could step outside their limited anthology space and create a fun, thrilling, and bloody adventure-length film.

Ready or Not

#3. Scream (2022)

While Scream will always be a polarizing franchise, this prequel, sequel, reboot — however you want to label it showed just how much Radio Silence knew the source material. It wasn’t lazy or cash-grabby, just a good time with legendary characters we love and new ones who grew on us.

Scream (2022)

#4 Southbound (The Way Out)

Radio Silence tosses their found footage modus operandi for this anthology film. Responsible for the bookend stories, they create a terrifying world in their segment titled The Way Out, which involves strange floating beings and some sort of time loop. It’s kind of the first time we see their work without a shaky cam. If we were to rank this entire film, it would remain at this position on the list.

Southbound

#5. V/H/S (10/31/98)

The film that started it all for Radio Silence. Or should we say the segment that started it all. Even though this isn’t feature-length what they managed to do with the time they had was very good. Their chapter was titled 10/31/98, a found-footage short involving a group of friends who crash what they think is a staged exorcism only to learn not to assume things on Halloween night.

V/H/S

#6. Scream VI

Cranking up the action, moving to the big city and letting Ghostface use a shotgun, Scream VI turned the franchise on its head. Like their first one, this film played with canon and managed to win over a lot of fans in its direction, but alienated others for coloring too far outside the lines of Wes Craven’s beloved series. If any sequel was showing how the trope was going stale it was Scream VI, but it managed to squeeze some fresh blood out of this nearly three-decade mainstay.

Scream VI

#7. Devil’s Due

Fairly underrated, this, Radio Silence’s first feature-length film, is a sampler of things they took from V/H/S. It was filmed in an omnipresent found footage style, showcasing a form of possession, and features clueless men. Since this was their first bonafide major studio job it’s a wonderful touchstone to see how far they have come with their storytelling.

Devil’s Due

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Perhaps the Scariest, Most Disturbing Series of The Year

Published

on

You may have never heard of Richard Gadd, but that will probably change after this month. His mini-series Baby Reindeer just hit Netflix and it’s a terrifying deep dive into abuse, addiction, and mental illness. What is even scarier is that it’s based on Gadd’s real-life hardships.

The crux of the story is about a man named Donny Dunn played by Gadd who wants to be a stand-up comedian, but it’s not working out so well thanks to stage fright stemming from his insecurity.

One day at his day job he meets a woman named Martha, played to unhinged perfection by Jessica Gunning, who is instantly charmed by Donny’s kindness and good looks. It doesn’t take long before she nicknames him “Baby Reindeer” and begins to relentlessly stalk him. But that is just the apex of Donny’s problems, he has his own incredibly disturbing issues.

This mini-series should come with a lot of triggers, so just be warned it is not for the faint of heart. The horrors here don’t come from blood and gore, but from physical and mental abuse that go beyond any physiological thriller you may have ever seen.

“It’s very emotionally true, obviously: I was severely stalked and severely abused,” Gadd said to People, explaining why he changed some aspects of the story. “But we wanted it to exist in the sphere of art, as well as protect the people it’s based on.”

The series has gained momentum thanks to positive word-of-mouth, and Gadd is getting used to the notoriety.

“It’s clearly struck a chord,” he told The Guardian. “I really did believe in it, but it’s taken off so quickly that I do feel a bit windswept.”

You can stream Baby Reindeer on Netflix right now.

If you or someone you know has been sexually assaulted, please contact the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-HOPE (4673) or go to rainn.org.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

The Original ‘Beetlejuice’ Sequel Had an Interesting Location

Published

on

beetlejuice in Hawaii Movie

Back in the late ’80s and early ’90s sequels to hit movies weren’t as linear as they are today. It was more like “let’s re-do the situation but in a different location.” Remember Speed 2, or National Lampoon’s European Vacation? Even Aliens, as good as it is, follows a lot of the plot points of the original; people stuck on a ship, an android, a little girl in peril instead of a cat. So it makes sense that one of the most popular supernatural comedies of all time, Beetlejuice would follow the same pattern.

In 1991 Tim Burton was interested in doing a sequel to his 1988 original, it was called Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian:

“The Deetz family moves to Hawaii to develop a resort. Construction begins, and it’s quickly discovered that the hotel will be sitting on top of an ancient burial ground. Beetlejuice comes in to save the day.”

Burton liked the script but wanted some re-writes so he asked then-hot screenwriter Daniel Waters who had just got done contributing to Heathers. He passed on the opportunity so producer David Geffen offered it to Troop Beverly Hills scribe Pamela Norris to no avail.

Eventually, Warner Bros. asked Kevin Smith to punch up Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian, he scoffed at the idea, saying, “Didn’t we say all we needed to say in the first Beetlejuice? Must we go tropical?”

Nine years later the sequel was killed. The studio said Winona Ryder was now too old for the part and an entire re-cast needed to happen. But Burton never gave up, there were a lot of directions he wanted to take his characters, including a Disney crossover.

“We talked about lots of different things,” the director said in Entertainment Weekly. “That was early on when we were going, Beetlejuice and the Haunted MansionBeetlejuice Goes West, whatever. Lots of things came up.”

Fast-forward to 2011 when another script was pitched for a sequel. This time the writer of Burton’s Dark Shadows,  Seth Grahame-Smith was hired and he wanted to make sure the story wasn’t a cash-grabbing remake or reboot. Four years later, in 2015, a script was approved with both Ryder and Keaton saying they would return to their respective roles. In 2017 that script was revamped and then eventually shelved in 2019.

During the time the sequel script was being tossed around in Hollywood, in 2016 an artist named Alex Murillo posted what looked like one-sheets for a Beetlejuice sequel. Although they were fabricated and had no affiliation with Warner Bros. people thought they were real.

Perhaps the virality of the artwork sparked interest in a Beetlejuice sequel once again, and finally, it was confirmed in 2022 Beetlejuice 2 had a green light from a script written by Wednesday writers  Alfred Gough and Miles Millar. The star of that series Jenna Ortega signed on to the new movie with filming starting in 2023. It was also confirmed that Danny Elfman would return to do the score.

Burton and Keaton agreed that the new film titled Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice wouldn’t rely on CGI or other other forms of technology. They wanted the film to feel “handmade.” The film wrapped in November 2023.

It’s been over three decades to come up with a sequel to Beetlejuice. Hopefully, since they said aloha to Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian there has been enough time and creativity to ensure Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice will not only honor the characters, but fans of the original.

Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice will open theatrically on September 6.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading