Connect with us

News

Horror Movies are Demonizing the Transgender Community

Published

on

Prior to the turn of the century most people’s knowledge of the transgender population came from movies, in particular horror movies.  This genre has been known to exploit the population, resulting in a very negative and inaccurate portrayal.  As a result, many desensitized movie goers have the negative association of this community consisting mainly of psychotic killers and psychopaths.

In most slasher movies that have dared to breach the topic of characters changing genders, it has been an overwhelming negative image.  This entire category of people has been boiled down to this inaccurate portrayal and demonized.

Fortunately, over the last handful of years many positive role models have stepped forward to lead the transgender movement, shattering these negative images.  Movies and television shows are beginning to adapt transgender characters and heroes to their scripts.  These changes are slowly beginning to help create a more positive image reflecting the community so many negative movies have established for so long.  However, the horror genre has been lagging behind the times and continues to use transgender men and women as villains, and their transition (usually forced upon them by another) as an explanation for their compulsion to kill.

The genre has also tied the theme of abuse and forced gender modification to the transgender population, where this is just not the case.  In many of these movies transgender women especially had been abused as children by a family member and in the process have been forced against their will to dress as the opposite sex.  This common trope deeply insults and belittles the community and the actual reasons one dresses and lives as the opposite gender from whom they were born; because they were born in the wrong body.

“So what?”  You may be thinking.  “It’s just a movie.  These characters are just created for the sake of entertainment.”

Houston, TX protester

The problem is these fictional characters reaffirm the negative and inaccurate stereotype so many people have of this entire population, and an ignorant America is scarier than any horror movie.

A majority of movie goers will recall Buffalo Bill from Silence of the Lambs as the first time they encountered a transgender character in a film.  The scene where the serial killer dons a wig, make up, and hides his penis between his legs as he tries to look like a female shocked audiences worldwide, perhaps more than the act of killing and skinning his victims did.  In this brief scene an uneducated audience quickly made the association of wanting to change genders as wrong, disgusting, and disturbing.

Ted Levine ‘Silence of the Lambs’ Orion Pictures

While the movie won multiple Academy Awards, it further damaged the image of how people think of the transgender community.  However, this movie was not the first to reflect the rigid and damning stereotype, and it certainly has not been the last.

In 1960 Alfred Hitchcock brought us Psycho.  In this story a motel owner suffering from dissociative identity disorder (aka split personality) kills innocent guests while assuming the persona of his dead mother.  Unfortunately audiences quickly boiled this behavior down to a crazy man dressing in women’s clothing and wielding a kitchen knife.  Nowhere in the description of the character did we learn Norman Bates wanted to consciously change genders and live life as a woman, but rather that was his second personality not just emulating his mother’s behavior but believing he was his deceased mother.

Anthony Perkins ‘Psycho’ Paramount Pictures

The psychiatrist explains at the end of the movie Norman gave half of his own life to his mother, dressing and speaking like her.  “At times he could be both personalities, carry on both conversations.”  the psychiatrist further explained.  When the potential victims who caught Norman asked why he was dressed in a wig and dress the police officer in the room automatically jumped to the conclusion that Norman was a transvestite, but the psychiatrist quickly corrects him.  “A man who dresses in women’s clothing in order to achieve a sexual change or satisfaction is a transvestite.  But in Norman’s case, he was simply doing everything possible to keep alive the illusion of his mother being alive.  And when reality came to close, when danger or desire threatened that illusion, he dressed up, even into a cheap wig he bought.  He’d walk about the house, sit in her chair, speak in her voice.  He tried to be his mother.  Now he is.”  He further goes on to explain how Norman’s mind housed two different personalities, his own and his mother’s, and the dominant personality won out; that of his mother’s.

Unlike transvestites and transsexuals this was not a conscious decision on Norman’s part, but the medical diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder was not as fully understood as it is today, nor was the differences between transsexuals, transvestites, and transgender.  The 1960’s was a time that still considered homosexuality to be a disease, and not until 1987 was it fully taken out of the DSM as a mental illness.

Anthony Perkins ‘Psycho’ Paramount Pictures

1983’s slasher Sleepaway Camp is perhaps one of the most damaging portrayals of a transgender character in the history of the horror genre.  After surviving a tragic family accident where her brother and father both died, pre-teen Angela is sent to live with her eccentric aunt.  While we attribute the quiet girl’s shy demeanor and mousy ways to her past experiences and neurotic guardian, we don’t fully understand the extent of the situation until the end of the film.  In the last five minutes it is revealed it wasn’t Angela who survived the family tragedy, but her brother Peter.  After obtaining guardianship of the boy, Peter’s aunt Martha begins dressing him in girl’s clothing and treating him as his deceased sister.  She takes away his male identity and forces a female life upon him.

Desiree Gould and and Frank Sorrentino ‘Sleepaway Camp’ American Eagle Films

Upon subsequent viewings, knowing the true identity of the killer makes the murders all that much more shocking and symbolic.  Many of the kills somehow link to the threatening of “Angela’s” sexuality.  Judy, a pretty camper who flaunts her big breasts and feminine wiles to get her way, threatened Angela’s flat chested physique.  Later the girl meets her demise when she receives a hot curling iron into what we are left to assume is her vagina by the shadows we see displayed on the cabin wall and her blood curdling scream that follows.  Whether this is an act of repressed penis envy since Angela’s aunt emasculated her, or perhaps the writer’s way to take revenge against a camper who has been portrayed as the camp slut, we will never know.

When picked apart, many of Angela’s kills can be linked to her own confusion regarding her gender.  The camp chef, heavily implied to be a pedophile and a real monster and threat to the campers, meets his demise after making advances on the young and impressionable adolescent.  Furthermore, after witnessing the heterosexual relationship between camp counselor Meg and much older camp owner Mel, Angela kills them both.

Owen Hughes in ‘Sleepaway Camp’ American Eagle Films

As the movie reaches its unexpected climax, the murder of camper Paul, everything is put into perspective.  Paul was the only camper who was nice to Angela, and in fact showed genuine interest in her.  His actions weren’t vulgar or demeaning, he was truly innocent in expressing his feelings.  However, the years of conditioning to take the place of his sister conflicted with the internal chemistry of being born a boy, all of which erupted in this final kill of the movie.

Since it occurred off screen, we aren’t sure exactly what the situation was in Paul’s final moments.  However, we are lead to believe the two campers were meeting to explore their feelings for each other.  When camp counselors find the two campers, a naked Angel is lovingly cradling Paul’s decapitated head in her lap at the waterfront of the lake.  It is here where it is finally revealed Angela was Peter all along as she stands up revealing her male anatomy, an image forever burned into horror history.

Felissa Rose in ‘Sleepaway Camp’ by American Eagle Films

Leaving the audience to make their own conclusions why Angela decided to kill, the young camper’s backstory is further diluted by the early witnessing of her father’s relationship with another man in bed.  This past experience may have even created questions in Angela’s mind as to how she saw relationships as well as her own feelings for Paul.  However, it is strongly implied if Angela wasn’t forced to change genders by her aunt she would have lived life uninterrupted as Peter, not killing innocent people.

A more recent and still inaccurate reflection of the transgender population is Insidious 2 by James Wan.  In this movie the Black Bride killer is revealed to in fact be a man, Parker Crane.  Crane was subjected to years of abuse and forced genderfication at the hands of his psychotic mother.  She renamed him Marilyn and raised him as a girl; dressing him in the most frilly of dresses, forcing him to wear a wig, and decorating his bedroom with flower wallpaper, pink curtains, dolls, and rocking horses.  She would punish the young boy whenever he rebelled against his forced identity of ‘Marilyn’.  As Crane’s psyche begins to break down and insanity seeps in he dresses as the Black Bride, killing a total of 15 women before being apprehended by police.  The authorities found Crane in the hospital after his attempt to castrate himself.

Danielle Bisutti and Tyler Griffin in ‘Insidious: Chapter 2’ Blumhouse Pictures

Since the transgender movement has picked up strength and come to the forefront of the news there have been more positive and accurate role models, eagerly trying to dispel and erase these fictional characters.  Leaders of the community, many times celebrities in the entertainment industry, have stepped forward and to help mold a new, positive journey for the younger LGBT crowd.  Yet horror is still one area where the transgender character, mainly the transgender woman, is seen as mentally ill, evil, and vile.  Perhaps over time we will have our first transgender “final girl” step up to the monster and victoriously defeat them as many cis-gender girls have who have come before her.  However, until the movie makers are ready to make that step we have to support the transgender community across the world to stand up to the monster of ignorance and negativity.

 

Read more about the lack of representation of the LGBTQ community in iHorror writer Waylon Jordan’s article here; It’s 2007: Where are the Queer Horror Characters?

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Russell Crowe To Star in Another Exorcism Movie & It’s Not a Sequel

Published

on

Maybe it’s because The Exorcist just celebrated its 50th-anniversary last year, or maybe it’s because aging Academy Award-winning actors aren’t too proud to take on obscure roles, but Russell Crowe is visiting the Devil once again in yet another possession film. And it’s not related to his last one, The Pope’s Exorcist.

According to Collider, the film titled The Exorcism was originally going to be released under the name The Georgetown Project. Rights for its North American release were once in the hands of Miramax but then went to Vertical Entertainment. It will release on June 7 in theaters then head over to Shudder for subscribers.

Crowe will also star in this year’s upcoming Kraven the Hunter which is set to drop in theaters on August 30.

As for The Exorcism, Collider provides us with what it’s about:

“The film centers around actor Anthony Miller (Crowe), whose troubles come to the forefront as he shoots a supernatural horror movie. His estranged daughter (Ryan Simpkins) has to figure out whether he’s lapsing into his past addictions, or if something even more horrific is occurring. “

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

New F-Bomb Laden ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Trailer: Bloody Buddy Movie

Published

on

Deadpool & Wolverine might be the buddy movie of the decade. The two heterodox superheroes are back in the latest trailer for the summer blockbuster, this time with more f-bombs than a gangster film.

‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Movie Trailer

This time the focus is on Wolverine played by Hugh Jackman. The adamantium-infused X-Man is having a bit of a pity party when Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) arrives on the scene who then tries to convince him to team up for selfish reasons. The result is a profanity-filled trailer with a Strange surprise at the end.

Deadpool & Wolverine is one of the most anticipated movies of the year. It comes out on July 26. Here is the latest trailer, and we suggest if you are at work and your space isn’t private, you might want to put in headphones.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Original Blair Witch Cast Ask Lionsgate for Retroactive Residuals in Light of New Film

Published

on

The Blair Witch Project Cast

Jason Blum is planning to reboot The Blair Witch Project for the second time. That’s a fairly large task considering none of the reboots or sequels have managed to capture the magic of the 1999 film that brought found footage into the mainstream.

This idea has not been lost on the original Blair Witch cast, who has recently reached out to Lionsgate to ask for what they feel is fair compensation for their role in the pivotal film. Lionsgate gained access to The Blair Witch Project in 2003 when they purchased Artisan Entertainment.

Blair witch
The Blair Witch Project Cast

However, Artisan Entertainment was an independent studio before its purchase, meaning the actors were not part of SAG-AFTRA. As a result, the cast are not entitled to the same residuals from the project as actors in other major films. The cast doesn’t feel that the studio should be able to continue to profit off of their hard work and likenesses without fair compensation.

Their most recent request asks for “meaningful consultation on any future ‘Blair Witch’ reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc., in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.”

The blair witch project

At this time, Lionsgate has not offered any comment about this issue.

The full statement made by the cast can be found below.

OUR ASKS OF LIONSGATE (From Heather, Michael & Josh, stars of “The Blair Witch Project”):

1. Retroactive + future residual payments to Heather, Michael and Josh for acting services rendered in the original BWP, equivalent to the sum that would’ve been allotted through SAG-AFTRA, had we had proper union or legal representation when the film was made.

2. Meaningful consultation on any future Blair Witch reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc…, in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.

Note: Our film has now been rebooted twice, both times were a disappointment from a fan/box office/critical perspective. Neither of these films were made with significant creative input from the original team. As the insiders who created the Blair Witch and have been listening to what fans love & want for 25 years, we’re your single greatest, yet thus-far un-utilized secret-weapon!

3. “The Blair Witch Grant”: A 60k grant (the budget of our original movie), paid out yearly by Lionsgate, to an unknown/aspiring genre filmmaker to assist in making theirfirst feature film. This is a GRANT, not a development fund, hence Lionsgate will not own any of the underlying rights to the project.

A PUBLIC STATEMENT FROM THE DIRECTORS & PRODUCERS OF “THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT”:

As we near the 25th anniversary of The Blair Witch Project, our pride in the storyworld we created and the film we produced is reaffirmed by the recent announcement of a reboot by horror icons Jason Blum and James Wan.

While we, the original filmmakers, respect Lionsgate’s right to monetize the intellectual property as it sees fit, we must highlight the significant contributions of the original cast — Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Mike Williams. As the literal faces of what has become a franchise, their likenesses, voices, and real names are inseparably tied to The Blair Witch Project. Their unique contributions not only defined the film’s authenticity but continue to resonate with audiences around the world.

We celebrate our film’s legacy, and equally, we believe the actors deserve to be celebrated for their enduring association with the franchise.

Sincerely, Eduardo Sanchez, Dan Myrick, Gregg Hale, Robin Cowie, and Michael Monello

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading