Connect with us

News

Wolfman 2010: The Universal Monster Reboot Horror Fans Deserved

Published

on

Sometimes, the world doesn’t need a hero, it needs a monster. And in 2010, Universal gave us one, perhaps for the very last time.

As you’ve surely heard by now, Universal has decided to turn all their iconic monsters into superheroes, using the money-making Marvel model as inspiration for an entire universe of reboots that are set to take those characters away from us horror fans – and give them to people with more money than us.

It’s still unclear whether or not Dracula Untold (read our review) is a part of this shared universe, but we do know that Universal is currently prepping action-packed reboots of The Mummy, The Wolf Man and all the rest – and we can be pretty certain that Drac Untold is an indication of what’s to come.

Of course, taking classic monsters and making action stars out of them is nothing new, as films like 1999’s remake of The Mummy and the recent I, Frankenstein did just that. Similarly, Van Helsing was more action than horror, and if you saw the aforementioned Dracula Untold, you know the same can be said for that hunk of junk.

Why the shift from horror to action? Well, that probably has a little something to do with the poor box office performance of Universal’s Wolfman reboot, which came out just four years ago. Made on a budget of $150 million, the film opened in 2nd place but amassed a domestic gross of less than half its budget, which needless to say makes it a flop of fairly epic proportions.

It’s a damn shame, really, because The Wolfman 2010 could’ve – and by all means SHOULD’VE – been the prototype for Universal’s monster reboots, going forward. Love it or hate it, you simply can’t deny that the Joe Johnston-directed film at least got one thing right…

Wolfman Benicio Del Toro

It was a horror movie. It was actually a fucking horror movie.

It’s almost hard to even remember, in the wake of Dracula Untold and the recent reboot news, but there was a time when the Universal Monsters were actually… monsters. There was nothing heroic about the characters and their remarkable powers were curses that doomed them to lives of tragedy, rather than superpowers that helped them save the world.

The Wolfman, perhaps better than any modern day movie that has used those properties as a launching point, hit that particular nail squarely on the head. The tale of a tortured man (a perfectly cast Benicio del Toro) fighting for his life against the beast that resides within him, Wolfman 2010 is a horrifying, tragic and brutal MONSTER MOVIE, embodying the essence of everything that Universal once stood for.

The fact that so many fans of that Universal brand of monster movies failed to appreciate this retelling of the iconic tale is somewhat bewildering, as it very much feels cut from the same cloth as those classic films. Rich with a dread-filled, gothic atmosphere, The Wolfman favors story over action, preserving the general beats of the same-named 1941 film, while throwing some clever curve balls into the mix.

The love story at the heart of the movie, for one, is pretty ingenious, as the character of Gwen Conliffe went from a random love interest (in the original) to the wife of Lawrence Talbot’s deceased brother. And that relationship is wonderfully restrained, as it’s not so much a love affair as it is something much deeper. Lawrence reminds Gwen of her late husband and Gwen reminds Lawrence of both his brother and his deceased mother, and their relationship becomes more about protecting one another than it is about sex or romance. It’s quite beautiful, actually, and executed in a very classy way.

And then there’s Lawrence’s father John Talbot, played by Anthony Hopkins. Unlike the original, Mr. Talbot is a werewolf himself in the 2010 remake, responsible for the murders of both Lawrence’s mother and his brother. The werewolf lineage adds a whole new layer to the tragic tale, and the new story elements all serve to breathe new life into that classic story. A remake done right, is what I call that.

Wolfman 2010 gore

One of the most notable differences between The Wolf Man and The Wolfman is how phenomenally gory the latter is, as no punches are pulled in that department (particularly in the unrated version). There are several scenes where the Wolfman goes through victims like Jason Voorhees, swiping off heads, tearing out throats and ripping out guts. It’s an incredibly brutal film, as any movie bearing the title Wolfman should be.

Not only are the gore effects terrific but so too is the look of the monster, which came courtesy of makeup effects legend Rick Baker. Looking like a much more horrifying version of the original incarnation, the Wolfman in the 2010 reboot is a nice fusion of man and beast, as Baker’s makeup retains the humanity of the character and blurs those lines in the same way the overall movies does. He’s not just a werewolf, he’s a ‘Wolfman,’ and the badass design totally nails that.

As for the transformations, Baker’s effects are joined side-by-side with a whole lot of CGI, which many have criticized the film for. Personally speaking, I think they work pretty damn well together, and the CGI rarely comes across as a problem. Sure, the transformations have got nothing on the work Baker did on An American Werewolf in London, but they’re still pretty damn awesome, effectively conveying the excruciating pain that Talbot goes through in those moments.

The Wolfman 2010

Like all the best remakes, The Wolfman pays loving tribute to the original and brings its own style and substance to the table, managing to genuinely feel like what you’d expect a modern day Universal Monster movie to feel like. And that’s again primarily because it’s a horror movie, at the end of the day. Whereas movies like I, Frankenstein and Dracula Untold barely feel like they belong in the same world as the classics, The Wolfman celebrates that lineage, and is a much better film than the others because of it.

Several years down the road, when Universal’s master plan has been completely revealed, I firmly believe that even the biggest haters of The Wolfman 2010 are going to look back on it and realize just how good us horror fans once had it. I can’t help but wish those same realizations had been made back then, as a better box office performance likely would’ve resulted in it becoming the template for future monster reboots.

And I think you’ll agree with me, whether you’ve yet come to appreciate The Wolfman or not, that you’d much rather Universal continue down its path, than the superhero one. Am I right?

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Lists

Thrills and Chills: Ranking ‘Radio Silence’ Films from Bloody Brilliant to Just Bloody

Published

on

Radio Silence Films

Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, Tyler Gillett, and Chad Villella are all filmmakers under the collective label called Radio Silence. Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett are the primary directors under that moniker while Villella produces.

They have gained popularity over the past 13 years and their films have become known as having a certain Radio Silence “signature.” They are bloody, usually contain monsters, and have breakneck action sequences. Their recent film Abigail exemplifies that signature and is perhaps their best film yet. They are currently working on a reboot of John Carpenter’s Escape From New York.

We thought we would go through the list of projects they have directed and rank them from high to low. None of the movies and shorts on this list are bad, they all have their merits. These rankings from top to bottom are just ones we felt showcased their talents the best.

We didn’t include movies they produced but didn’t direct.

#1. Abigail

An update to the second film on this list, Abagail is the natural progression of Radio Silence’s love of lockdown horror. It follows in pretty much the same footsteps of Ready or Not, but manages to go one better — make it about vampires.

Abigail

#2. Ready or Not

This film put Radio Silence on the map. While not as successful at the box office as some of their other films, Ready or Not proved that the team could step outside their limited anthology space and create a fun, thrilling, and bloody adventure-length film.

Ready or Not

#3. Scream (2022)

While Scream will always be a polarizing franchise, this prequel, sequel, reboot — however you want to label it showed just how much Radio Silence knew the source material. It wasn’t lazy or cash-grabby, just a good time with legendary characters we love and new ones who grew on us.

Scream (2022)

#4 Southbound (The Way Out)

Radio Silence tosses their found footage modus operandi for this anthology film. Responsible for the bookend stories, they create a terrifying world in their segment titled The Way Out, which involves strange floating beings and some sort of time loop. It’s kind of the first time we see their work without a shaky cam. If we were to rank this entire film, it would remain at this position on the list.

Southbound

#5. V/H/S (10/31/98)

The film that started it all for Radio Silence. Or should we say the segment that started it all. Even though this isn’t feature-length what they managed to do with the time they had was very good. Their chapter was titled 10/31/98, a found-footage short involving a group of friends who crash what they think is a staged exorcism only to learn not to assume things on Halloween night.

V/H/S

#6. Scream VI

Cranking up the action, moving to the big city and letting Ghostface use a shotgun, Scream VI turned the franchise on its head. Like their first one, this film played with canon and managed to win over a lot of fans in its direction, but alienated others for coloring too far outside the lines of Wes Craven’s beloved series. If any sequel was showing how the trope was going stale it was Scream VI, but it managed to squeeze some fresh blood out of this nearly three-decade mainstay.

Scream VI

#7. Devil’s Due

Fairly underrated, this, Radio Silence’s first feature-length film, is a sampler of things they took from V/H/S. It was filmed in an omnipresent found footage style, showcasing a form of possession, and features clueless men. Since this was their first bonafide major studio job it’s a wonderful touchstone to see how far they have come with their storytelling.

Devil’s Due

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

News

Perhaps the Scariest, Most Disturbing Series of The Year

Published

on

You may have never heard of Richard Gadd, but that will probably change after this month. His mini-series Baby Reindeer just hit Netflix and it’s a terrifying deep dive into abuse, addiction, and mental illness. What is even scarier is that it’s based on Gadd’s real-life hardships.

The crux of the story is about a man named Donny Dunn played by Gadd who wants to be a stand-up comedian, but it’s not working out so well thanks to stage fright stemming from his insecurity.

One day at his day job he meets a woman named Martha, played to unhinged perfection by Jessica Gunning, who is instantly charmed by Donny’s kindness and good looks. It doesn’t take long before she nicknames him “Baby Reindeer” and begins to relentlessly stalk him. But that is just the apex of Donny’s problems, he has his own incredibly disturbing issues.

This mini-series should come with a lot of triggers, so just be warned it is not for the faint of heart. The horrors here don’t come from blood and gore, but from physical and mental abuse that go beyond any physiological thriller you may have ever seen.

“It’s very emotionally true, obviously: I was severely stalked and severely abused,” Gadd said to People, explaining why he changed some aspects of the story. “But we wanted it to exist in the sphere of art, as well as protect the people it’s based on.”

The series has gained momentum thanks to positive word-of-mouth, and Gadd is getting used to the notoriety.

“It’s clearly struck a chord,” he told The Guardian. “I really did believe in it, but it’s taken off so quickly that I do feel a bit windswept.”

You can stream Baby Reindeer on Netflix right now.

If you or someone you know has been sexually assaulted, please contact the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-HOPE (4673) or go to rainn.org.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading

Movies

The Original ‘Beetlejuice’ Sequel Had an Interesting Location

Published

on

beetlejuice in Hawaii Movie

Back in the late ’80s and early ’90s sequels to hit movies weren’t as linear as they are today. It was more like “let’s re-do the situation but in a different location.” Remember Speed 2, or National Lampoon’s European Vacation? Even Aliens, as good as it is, follows a lot of the plot points of the original; people stuck on a ship, an android, a little girl in peril instead of a cat. So it makes sense that one of the most popular supernatural comedies of all time, Beetlejuice would follow the same pattern.

In 1991 Tim Burton was interested in doing a sequel to his 1988 original, it was called Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian:

“The Deetz family moves to Hawaii to develop a resort. Construction begins, and it’s quickly discovered that the hotel will be sitting on top of an ancient burial ground. Beetlejuice comes in to save the day.”

Burton liked the script but wanted some re-writes so he asked then-hot screenwriter Daniel Waters who had just got done contributing to Heathers. He passed on the opportunity so producer David Geffen offered it to Troop Beverly Hills scribe Pamela Norris to no avail.

Eventually, Warner Bros. asked Kevin Smith to punch up Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian, he scoffed at the idea, saying, “Didn’t we say all we needed to say in the first Beetlejuice? Must we go tropical?”

Nine years later the sequel was killed. The studio said Winona Ryder was now too old for the part and an entire re-cast needed to happen. But Burton never gave up, there were a lot of directions he wanted to take his characters, including a Disney crossover.

“We talked about lots of different things,” the director said in Entertainment Weekly. “That was early on when we were going, Beetlejuice and the Haunted MansionBeetlejuice Goes West, whatever. Lots of things came up.”

Fast-forward to 2011 when another script was pitched for a sequel. This time the writer of Burton’s Dark Shadows,  Seth Grahame-Smith was hired and he wanted to make sure the story wasn’t a cash-grabbing remake or reboot. Four years later, in 2015, a script was approved with both Ryder and Keaton saying they would return to their respective roles. In 2017 that script was revamped and then eventually shelved in 2019.

During the time the sequel script was being tossed around in Hollywood, in 2016 an artist named Alex Murillo posted what looked like one-sheets for a Beetlejuice sequel. Although they were fabricated and had no affiliation with Warner Bros. people thought they were real.

Perhaps the virality of the artwork sparked interest in a Beetlejuice sequel once again, and finally, it was confirmed in 2022 Beetlejuice 2 had a green light from a script written by Wednesday writers  Alfred Gough and Miles Millar. The star of that series Jenna Ortega signed on to the new movie with filming starting in 2023. It was also confirmed that Danny Elfman would return to do the score.

Burton and Keaton agreed that the new film titled Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice wouldn’t rely on CGI or other other forms of technology. They wanted the film to feel “handmade.” The film wrapped in November 2023.

It’s been over three decades to come up with a sequel to Beetlejuice. Hopefully, since they said aloha to Beetlejuice Goes Hawaiian there has been enough time and creativity to ensure Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice will not only honor the characters, but fans of the original.

Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice will open theatrically on September 6.

'Civil War' Review: Is It Worth Watching?

Continue Reading